Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Execution Block ID uid://A001/X15b4/X37 Sgr_A_st_b_updated_03_7M #162

Open
14 of 15 tasks
keflavich opened this issue Jun 14, 2022 · 7 comments
Open
14 of 15 tasks

Execution Block ID uid://A001/X15b4/X37 Sgr_A_st_b_updated_03_7M #162

keflavich opened this issue Jun 14, 2022 · 7 comments
Assignees
Labels
7m Delivered Done but needs second opinion EB Execution Block uvcontsub_problem Cube has problems with UV continuum subtraction and may need image-domain subtraction

Comments

@keflavich
Copy link
Contributor

keflavich commented Jun 14, 2022

Sgr_A_st_b_updated_03_7M
uid://A001/X15b4/X37

Product Links:

Reprocessed Product Links:

@keflavich keflavich added 7m EB Execution Block labels Jun 14, 2022
@xinglunju xinglunju self-assigned this Sep 7, 2022
@xinglunju
Copy link
Contributor

xinglunju commented Sep 14, 2022

Calibration

Looks good overall.

  • In step 12 hifa_bandpassflag, in one EB uid___A002_Xfabf9b_X1d63.ms, there is one scan that is flagged for spws 16/18/24/26 for the bandpass calibrator, but is not flagged for spw20/22.
    image

As a result, in step 19 hif_applycal, the bandpass calibrator of this EB shows a glitch in the phase/amp vs time plots. However this should not affect the bandpass calibration a lot, which considers a different dimension (phase/amp vs. freq).
image

Continuum imaging

Continuum identification (hif_findcont) is questionable, and can be improved a lot. This is part of Sgr B2, so there are lots of lines.
The continuum image looks ok, but may need careful masking and/or selfcal.
image

Line imaging

  • spw 16/18/20/24/26: low QA scores; significant residual emission in 'line-free' mom maps. Spw16 as an example is shown below. All these spws need to be re-imaged after a better continuum identification.
    image
    image

  • The only spw that got a high QA score, spw22 (for HNCO), shows a long emission feature. Is this a real feature?
    image

Hipergator pipeline run -- line imaging

Only spws 16/18/22 show up in the weblog (with low QA scores). There are errors for other spws.
And the other spws do not exist in globus. @keflavich could you take a look?

@xinglunju xinglunju added the Reclean Needs to be or has been recleaned label Sep 14, 2022
@xinglunju
Copy link
Contributor

Note to myself: this one needs a better cont.dat which cannot be done with editing the json script. I will try something on a local machine.

@xinglunju xinglunju added Done! and removed Reclean Needs to be or has been recleaned labels Dec 6, 2022
@xinglunju
Copy link
Contributor

As one of the SgrB2 fileds, this one can really be improved by a careful inspection of cont.dat, but I guess this is beyond the point of weblog reviews. So I will tentatively mark this one as 'done'.

@pyhsiehATalma
Copy link
Contributor

@keflavich @xinglunju

I couldn't find line cube of spw24 under /working. it looks like tclean stop at some point?

@xinglunju
Copy link
Contributor

@pyhsiehATalma The cube of spw24 is available under /working now.

The cube looks fine overall.

However, toward the upper left corner, the bright source Sgr B2(M) has some continuum baseline issue, which is not surprising... I guess we can do a baseline subtraction in the image domain.
image

@xinglunju xinglunju added the uvcontsub_problem Cube has problems with UV continuum subtraction and may need image-domain subtraction label Jun 28, 2023
@pyhsiehATalma
Copy link
Contributor

@xinglunju thanks for the manual imaging of spw24. I downloaded the cube. Here is just one thing minor, the cube has multiple synthesize beam information per channel, could you please run imsmooth with kernal='common' and upload the cube again? I have done it locally for the purpose of mosaic. I think feather will fail with multiple synthesize beam cube.

imsmooth( imagename='uid___A001_X15b4_X37.s38_0.Sgr_A_star_sci.spw24.cube.I.iter1.image.pbcor',kernel='common',outfile='uid___A001_X15b4_X37.s38_0.Sgr_A_star_sci.spw24.cube.I.iter1.image.pbcor.common')
~
~
~

@xinglunju
Copy link
Contributor

@pyhsiehATalma I didn't manually image the SPW24 cube... It is from the pipeline on hipergator. Nonetheless I uploaded the common-beam cube to /upload/Sgr_A_st_b_updated_03_7M_reclean/
Let me know if you need smoothed cubes for other SBs!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
7m Delivered Done but needs second opinion EB Execution Block uvcontsub_problem Cube has problems with UV continuum subtraction and may need image-domain subtraction
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants