Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Execution Block ID uid://A001/X15a0/Xf8 Sgr_A_st_o_03_TP #278

Open
13 of 14 tasks
keflavich opened this issue Oct 6, 2022 · 4 comments
Open
13 of 14 tasks

Execution Block ID uid://A001/X15a0/Xf8 Sgr_A_st_o_03_TP #278

keflavich opened this issue Oct 6, 2022 · 4 comments

Comments

@keflavich
Copy link
Contributor

keflavich commented Oct 6, 2022

Sgr_A_st_o_03_TP
uid://A001/X15a0/Xf8

  • Observations completed?

  • Delivered?

  • Downloaded? (specify where)

    • hipergator
  • Weblog unpacked

  • Weblog Quality Assessment?

  • Imaging: Continuum

  • Imaging: Lines

    • SPW16 H13CN
    • SPW18 H13CO+/SiO
    • SPW20 HCO+
    • SPW22 HNCO
    • SPW24 Cont 1
    • SPW26 Cont 2

Product Links:

Reprocessed Product Links:

@eacmills
Copy link
Contributor

HCO+/SPW 21 has some bad baseline fits
spectral_plot_before_subtraction_uid___A002_Xff45a6_X5b7 ms atmcor_Sgr_A_star_ant0_spw21_pol0

@SpacialTree
Copy link
Contributor

For the Weblog QA, the only step with a lower QA score was (13) hsd_imaging, which was due to a high percentage (~0.03%) of masked pixels.

@SpacialTree
Copy link
Contributor

The baseline RMS image for spectral window 21 has an odd circular feature in the bottom right, likely related to the bad baseline fit mentioned above.
image

The masked average spectrum of spw 21 shows a bad baseline, too.
image

Should there be a continuum image? I'm going to assume that was erroneously added to the checklist.

@SpacialTree
Copy link
Contributor

Spw 17. The first and last channels are higher than the baseline for some reason. Otherwise, the cube looks fine.
image

Spw 19. Again, the first and last channels are oddly high compared to the baseline.
image

A zoom-in of the baseline shows that it varies periodically, maybe a baseline ripple?
image

Spw 21. As expected from the baseline issues mentioned before, the baseline of this cube is messed up. There is a negative bowl here, at the same location as the RMS feature.
image

Spw 23. There is also a negative feature here, in the same location as the negative bowl in Spw 21.
image

Spw 25. The baseline is very rippled for this spectral window. Note: When first opening the cube, it seems empty, like there are empty channels at the start of the cube.
image

There is a spectral line hidden in the noise.
image

Spw 27. Similar to Spw 25, the baseline looks like it has a ripple, but it seems rich with lines hidden in the noise. Note: When first opening the cube, it seems empty, like there are empty channels at the start of the cube.
image

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
Status: Total Power Execution Blocks under QA
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants