We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
ABP is introducing backward-compatible syntaxes [-abp-has and [-abp-has-text. https://issues.adblockplus.org/ticket/3143 https://issues.adblockplus.org/ticket/5249 We need to convert them into :has and :contains respectively.
[-abp-has
[-abp-has-text
:has
:contains
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
-abp should be just an alias for our existing -ext
-abp
-ext
Sorry, something went wrong.
@seanl-adg I've been thinking about it lately and after all, I suppose we should support this syntax natively (talking about :-abp-has()).
:-abp-has()
It's not hard to do, and it'd be easier for people to import external filter lists which use that syntax.
Here is what should be done:
has
#?#
:-abp-has
They changed their syntax to -abp-contains instead of -abp-has-text
-abp-contains
-abp-has-text
theseanl
No branches or pull requests
ABP is introducing backward-compatible syntaxes
[-abp-has
and[-abp-has-text
.https://issues.adblockplus.org/ticket/3143
https://issues.adblockplus.org/ticket/5249
We need to convert them into
:has
and:contains
respectively.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: