You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In the course of #1288 I added a test for Match reproducibility given a random seed. The strategy Darwin fails this test because it retains history at the class level. While this is an exception now, it's easy to imagine future games or variations that would intentionally retain history (in a way that's not considered cheating). So perhaps it makes sense to have a classifier field for "retains_history".
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I realize now this test is quite similar to the existing test_clone which excludes Darwin and Human, nevertheless perhaps the classifier still makes sense.
In the course of #1288 I added a test for Match reproducibility given a random seed. The strategy Darwin fails this test because it retains history at the class level. While this is an exception now, it's easy to imagine future games or variations that would intentionally retain history (in a way that's not considered cheating). So perhaps it makes sense to have a classifier field for "retains_history".
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: