Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Hub Generated] Review request for Microsoft.VirtualMachineImages to add version stable/2020-02-14 #16725

Conversation

rezmicrosoft
Copy link
Contributor

@rezmicrosoft rezmicrosoft commented Nov 10, 2021

This is a PR generated at OpenAPI Hub. You can view your work branch via this link.

Changelog

Add a changelog entry for this PR by answering the following questions:

  1. What's the purpose of the update?
    • new service onboarding
    • new API version
    • [] update existing version for new feature
    • update existing version to fix swagger quality issue in s360
    • Other, please clarify
      Just update a description of a field in Swagger. No breaking changes.
  2. When are you targeting to deploy the new service/feature to public regions? Please provide the date or, if the date is not yet available, the month.
    11/ 15
  3. When do you expect to publish the swagger? Please provide date or, the the date is not yet available, the month.
    11/ 15
  4. If updating an existing version, please select the specific langauge SDKs and CLIs that must be refreshed after the swagger is published.
    • SDK of .NET (need service team to ensure code readiness)
    • SDK of Python
    • SDK of Java
    • SDK of Js
    • SDK of Go
    • PowerShell
    • CLI
    • Terraform
    • No refresh required for updates in this PR

Contribution checklist:

If any further question about AME onboarding or validation tools, please view the FAQ.

ARM API Review Checklist

Applicability: ⚠️

If your changes encompass only the following scenarios, you should SKIP this section, as these scenarios do not require ARM review.

  • Change to data plane APIs
  • Adding new properties
  • All removals

Otherwise your PR may be subject to ARM review requirements. Complete the following:

  • Check this box if any of the following apply to the PR so that label “WaitForARMFeedback” will be added automatically to begin ARM API Review. Failure to comply may result in delays to the manifest.

    • Adding a new service
    • Adding new API(s)
    • Adding a new API version
      -[ ] To review changes efficiently, ensure you copy the existing version into the new directory structure for first commit and then push new changes, including version updates, in separate commits.
  • Ensure you've reviewed following guidelines including ARM resource provider contract and REST guidelines. Estimated time (4 hours). This is required before you can request review from ARM API Review board.

  • If you are blocked on ARM review and want to get the PR merged with urgency, please get the ARM oncall for reviews (RP Manifest Approvers team under Azure Resource Manager service) from IcM and reach out to them.

Breaking Change Review Checklist

If any of the following scenarios apply to the PR, request approval from the Breaking Change Review Board as defined in the Breaking Change Policy.

  • Removing API(s) in a stable version
  • Removing properties in a stable version
  • Removing API version(s) in a stable version
  • Updating API in a stable or public preview version with Breaking Change Validation errors
  • Updating API(s) in public preview over 1 year (refer to Retirement of Previews)

Action: to initiate an evaluation of the breaking change, create a new intake using the template for breaking changes. Addition details on the process and office hours are on the Breaking change Wiki.

Please follow the link to find more details on PR review process.

@openapi-workflow-bot
Copy link

Hi, @rezmicrosoft Thanks for your PR. I am workflow bot for review process. Here are some small tips.

  • Please ensure to do self-check against checklists in first PR comment.
  • PR assignee is the person auto-assigned and responsible for your current PR reviewing and merging.
  • For specs comparison cross API versions, Use API Specs Comparison Report Generator
  • If there is CI failure(s), to fix CI error(s) is mandatory for PR merging; or you need to provide justification in PR comment for explanation. How to fix?

  • Any feedback about review process or workflow bot, pls contact swagger and tools team. [email protected]

    @openapi-workflow-bot
    Copy link

    [Call for Action] To better understand Azure service dev/test scenario, and support Azure service developer better on Swagger and REST API related tests in early phase, please help to fill in with this survey https://aka.ms/SurveyForEarlyPhase. It will take 5 to 10 minutes. If you already complete survey, please neglect this comment. Thanks.

    @openapi-pipeline-app
    Copy link

    openapi-pipeline-app bot commented Nov 10, 2021

    Swagger Validation Report

    ️️✔️BreakingChange succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    There are no breaking changes.

    ️⚠️LintDiff: 0 Warnings warning [Detail]
    The following errors/warnings exist before current PR submission:

    Only 30 items are listed, please refer to log for more details.

    Rule Message
    R2026 - AvoidAnonymousTypes Inline/anonymous models must not be used, instead define a schema with a model name in the 'definitions' section and refer to it. This allows operations to share the models.
    Location: Microsoft.VirtualMachineImages/stable/2020-02-14/imagebuilder.json#L1126
    R4007 - DefaultErrorResponseSchema the default error response schema does not correspond to the schema documented at https://github.com/Azure/azure-resource-manager-rpc/blob/master/v1.0/common-api-details.md#error-response-content.
    Location: Microsoft.VirtualMachineImages/stable/2020-02-14/imagebuilder.json#L59
    R4007 - DefaultErrorResponseSchema the default error response schema does not correspond to the schema documented at https://github.com/Azure/azure-resource-manager-rpc/blob/master/v1.0/common-api-details.md#error-response-content.
    Location: Microsoft.VirtualMachineImages/stable/2020-02-14/imagebuilder.json#L101
    R4007 - DefaultErrorResponseSchema the default error response schema does not correspond to the schema documented at https://github.com/Azure/azure-resource-manager-rpc/blob/master/v1.0/common-api-details.md#error-response-content.
    Location: Microsoft.VirtualMachineImages/stable/2020-02-14/imagebuilder.json#L161
    R4007 - DefaultErrorResponseSchema the default error response schema does not correspond to the schema documented at https://github.com/Azure/azure-resource-manager-rpc/blob/master/v1.0/common-api-details.md#error-response-content.
    Location: Microsoft.VirtualMachineImages/stable/2020-02-14/imagebuilder.json#L220
    R4007 - DefaultErrorResponseSchema the default error response schema does not correspond to the schema documented at https://github.com/Azure/azure-resource-manager-rpc/blob/master/v1.0/common-api-details.md#error-response-content.
    Location: Microsoft.VirtualMachineImages/stable/2020-02-14/imagebuilder.json#L267
    R4007 - DefaultErrorResponseSchema the default error response schema does not correspond to the schema documented at https://github.com/Azure/azure-resource-manager-rpc/blob/master/v1.0/common-api-details.md#error-response-content.
    Location: Microsoft.VirtualMachineImages/stable/2020-02-14/imagebuilder.json#L310
    R4007 - DefaultErrorResponseSchema the default error response schema does not correspond to the schema documented at https://github.com/Azure/azure-resource-manager-rpc/blob/master/v1.0/common-api-details.md#error-response-content.
    Location: Microsoft.VirtualMachineImages/stable/2020-02-14/imagebuilder.json#L359
    R4007 - DefaultErrorResponseSchema the default error response schema does not correspond to the schema documented at https://github.com/Azure/azure-resource-manager-rpc/blob/master/v1.0/common-api-details.md#error-response-content.
    Location: Microsoft.VirtualMachineImages/stable/2020-02-14/imagebuilder.json#L408
    R4007 - DefaultErrorResponseSchema the default error response schema does not correspond to the schema documented at https://github.com/Azure/azure-resource-manager-rpc/blob/master/v1.0/common-api-details.md#error-response-content.
    Location: Microsoft.VirtualMachineImages/stable/2020-02-14/imagebuilder.json#L454
    R4007 - DefaultErrorResponseSchema the default error response schema does not correspond to the schema documented at https://github.com/Azure/azure-resource-manager-rpc/blob/master/v1.0/common-api-details.md#error-response-content.
    Location: Microsoft.VirtualMachineImages/stable/2020-02-14/imagebuilder.json#L502
    R4007 - DefaultErrorResponseSchema the default error response schema does not correspond to the schema documented at https://github.com/Azure/azure-resource-manager-rpc/blob/master/v1.0/common-api-details.md#error-response-content.
    Location: Microsoft.VirtualMachineImages/stable/2020-02-14/imagebuilder.json#L535
    R4013 - IntegerTypeMustHaveFormat The integer type does not have a format, please add it.
    Location: Microsoft.VirtualMachineImages/stable/2020-02-14/imagebuilder.json#L732
    R4013 - IntegerTypeMustHaveFormat The integer type does not have a format, please add it.
    Location: Microsoft.VirtualMachineImages/stable/2020-02-14/imagebuilder.json#L777
    R4013 - IntegerTypeMustHaveFormat The integer type does not have a format, please add it.
    Location: Microsoft.VirtualMachineImages/stable/2020-02-14/imagebuilder.json#L951
    R4013 - IntegerTypeMustHaveFormat The integer type does not have a format, please add it.
    Location: Microsoft.VirtualMachineImages/stable/2020-02-14/imagebuilder.json#L1093
    R4037 - MissingTypeObject The schema 'ImageTemplateListResult' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'.
    Location: Microsoft.VirtualMachineImages/stable/2020-02-14/imagebuilder.json#L549
    R4037 - MissingTypeObject The schema 'ImageTemplateSource' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'.
    Location: Microsoft.VirtualMachineImages/stable/2020-02-14/imagebuilder.json#L565
    R4037 - MissingTypeObject The schema 'ImageTemplatePlatformImageSource' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'.
    Location: Microsoft.VirtualMachineImages/stable/2020-02-14/imagebuilder.json#L578
    R4037 - MissingTypeObject The schema 'ImageTemplateManagedImageSource' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'.
    Location: Microsoft.VirtualMachineImages/stable/2020-02-14/imagebuilder.json#L609
    R4037 - MissingTypeObject The schema 'ImageTemplateSharedImageVersionSource' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'.
    Location: Microsoft.VirtualMachineImages/stable/2020-02-14/imagebuilder.json#L627
    R4037 - MissingTypeObject The schema 'ImageTemplateCustomizer' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'.
    Location: Microsoft.VirtualMachineImages/stable/2020-02-14/imagebuilder.json#L645
    R4037 - MissingTypeObject The schema 'ImageTemplateShellCustomizer' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'.
    Location: Microsoft.VirtualMachineImages/stable/2020-02-14/imagebuilder.json#L662
    R4037 - MissingTypeObject The schema 'ImageTemplateRestartCustomizer' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'.
    Location: Microsoft.VirtualMachineImages/stable/2020-02-14/imagebuilder.json#L689
    R4037 - MissingTypeObject The schema 'ImageTemplateWindowsUpdateCustomizer' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'.
    Location: Microsoft.VirtualMachineImages/stable/2020-02-14/imagebuilder.json#L712
    R4037 - MissingTypeObject The schema 'ImageTemplatePowerShellCustomizer' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'.
    Location: Microsoft.VirtualMachineImages/stable/2020-02-14/imagebuilder.json#L739
    R4037 - MissingTypeObject The schema 'ImageTemplateFileCustomizer' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'.
    Location: Microsoft.VirtualMachineImages/stable/2020-02-14/imagebuilder.json#L783
    R4037 - MissingTypeObject The schema 'PlatformImagePurchasePlan' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'.
    Location: Microsoft.VirtualMachineImages/stable/2020-02-14/imagebuilder.json#L912
    R4037 - MissingTypeObject The schema 'VirtualNetworkConfig' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'.
    Location: Microsoft.VirtualMachineImages/stable/2020-02-14/imagebuilder.json#L934
    R4037 - MissingTypeObject The schema 'ImageTemplateVmProfile' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'.
    Location: Microsoft.VirtualMachineImages/stable/2020-02-14/imagebuilder.json#L943
    ️️✔️Avocado succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for Avocado.
    ️️✔️~[Staging] ApiReadinessCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    ️️✔️ModelValidation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for ModelValidation.
    ️️✔️SemanticValidation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for SemanticValidation.
    ️️✔️Cross-Version Breaking Changes succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    There are no breaking changes.
    ️️✔️CredScan succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    There is no credential detected.
    ️️✔️SDK Track2 Validation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for SDKTrack2Validation

    ️️✔️PrettierCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for PrettierCheck.
    ️️✔️SpellCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for SpellCheck.
    ️️✔️Lint(RPaaS) succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for Lint(RPaaS).
    Posted by Swagger Pipeline | How to fix these errors?

    @openapi-pipeline-app
    Copy link

    openapi-pipeline-app bot commented Nov 10, 2021

    Swagger Generation Artifacts

    ️️✔️ApiDocPreview succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
     Please click here to preview with your @microsoft account. 
    ️️✔️SDK Breaking Change Tracking succeeded [Detail] [Expand]

    Breaking Changes Tracking

    ️✔️azure-sdk-for-python-track2 - track2_azure-mgmt-imagebuilder - 1.0.0b1
    ️✔️azure-sdk-for-go - virtualmachineimagebuilder/mgmt/2020-02-14/virtualmachineimagebuilder - v59.1.0
    ️✔️azure-sdk-for-go - preview/virtualmachineimagebuilder/mgmt/2019-05-01-preview/virtualmachineimagebuilder - v59.1.0
    ️✔️azure-sdk-for-go - preview/virtualmachineimagebuilder/mgmt/2019-02-01-preview/virtualmachineimagebuilder - v59.1.0
    ️✔️azure-sdk-for-go - preview/virtualmachineimagebuilder/mgmt/2018-02-01-preview/virtualmachineimagebuilder - v59.1.0
    ️❌ azure-powershell failed [Detail]
    • Failed [Logs]Release - Generate from 3d21367. SDK Automation 14.0.0
      command	sh ./tools/SwaggerCI/init.sh ../azure-powershell_tmp/initInput.json ../azure-powershell_tmp/initOutput.json
      command	pwsh ./tools/SwaggerCI/psci.ps1 ../azure-powershell_tmp/generateInput.json ../azure-powershell_tmp/generateOutput.json
      Resource not accessible by integration
      HttpError: Resource not accessible by integration
          at /home/vsts/work/1/a/unified-pipeline-runtime/common/temp/node_modules/.pnpm/@[email protected]/node_modules/@octokit/request/dist-node/index.js:86:21
          at processTicksAndRejections (internal/process/task_queues.js:95:5)
          at async workflowPkgUpdatePR (/home/vsts/work/1/a/unified-pipeline-runtime/private/openapi-sdk-automation/lib/automation/workflowPackage.js:346:21)
          at async Object.exports.workflowPkgMain (/home/vsts/work/1/a/unified-pipeline-runtime/private/openapi-sdk-automation/lib/automation/workflowPackage.js:41:5)
          at async workflowHandleReadmeMd (/home/vsts/work/1/a/unified-pipeline-runtime/private/openapi-sdk-automation/lib/automation/workflow.js:172:9)
          at async Object.exports.workflowMain (/home/vsts/work/1/a/unified-pipeline-runtime/private/openapi-sdk-automation/lib/automation/workflow.js:83:9)
          at async Object.exports.sdkAutoMain (/home/vsts/work/1/a/unified-pipeline-runtime/private/openapi-sdk-automation/lib/automation/entrypoint.js:152:13)
          at async /home/vsts/work/1/a/unified-pipeline-runtime/private/openapi-sdk-automation/lib/cli/cli.js:20:18
    • ️✔️Az.ImageBuilder [View full logs
      error	Fatal error: Resource not accessible by integration
      error	The following packages are still pending:
      error		Az.ImageBuilder
    ️⚠️ azure-sdk-for-python-track2 warning [Detail]
    ️⚠️ azure-sdk-for-java warning [Detail]
    • ⚠️Warning [Logs]Release - Generate from 3d21367. SDK Automation 14.0.0
      command	./eng/mgmt/automation/init.sh ../azure-sdk-for-java_tmp/initInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-java_tmp/initOutput.json
      command	./eng/mgmt/automation/generate.py ../azure-sdk-for-java_tmp/generateInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-java_tmp/generateOutput.json
      cmderr	[generate.py] 2021-11-11 05:42:16 INFO [VERSION][Found] current version "com.azure.resourcemanager:azure-resourcemanager-imagebuilder;1.0.0-beta.1;1.0.0-beta.2"
      cmderr	[generate.py] 2021-11-11 05:42:16 INFO [VERSION][Not Found] cannot find stable version, current version "1.0.0-beta.2"
      cmderr	[generate.py] 2021-11-11 05:42:16 INFO autorest --version=3.6.0 --use=@autorest/[email protected] --java.azure-libraries-for-java-folder=/home/vsts/work/1/s/azure-sdk-for-java --java.output-folder=/home/vsts/work/1/s/azure-sdk-for-java/sdk/imagebuilder/azure-resourcemanager-imagebuilder --java.namespace=com.azure.resourcemanager.imagebuilder   --java --pipeline.modelerfour.additional-checks=false --pipeline.modelerfour.lenient-model-deduplication=true --azure-arm --verbose --sdk-integration --generate-samples --fluent=lite --java.fluent=lite --java.license-header=MICROSOFT_MIT_SMALL  ../azure-rest-api-specs/specification/imagebuilder/resource-manager/readme.md
      cmderr	[generate.py] 2021-11-11 05:42:47 INFO [CI][Skip] ci.yml already has module azure-resourcemanager-imagebuilder
      cmderr	[generate.py] 2021-11-11 05:42:47 INFO [POM][Process] dealing with pom.xml
      cmderr	[generate.py] 2021-11-11 05:42:47 INFO [POM][Skip] pom already has module azure-resourcemanager-imagebuilder
      cmderr	[generate.py] 2021-11-11 05:42:47 INFO [POM][Success] Write to pom.xml
      cmderr	[generate.py] 2021-11-11 05:42:47 INFO [POM][Process] dealing with root pom
      cmderr	[generate.py] 2021-11-11 05:42:47 INFO [POM][Skip] pom already has module sdk/imagebuilder
      cmderr	[generate.py] 2021-11-11 05:42:47 INFO [POM][Success] Write to root pom
    • ️✔️azure-resourcemanager-imagebuilder [View full logs]  [Release SDK Changes]
      cmderr	[Inst] 2021-11-11 05:45:32 DEBUG Got artifact_id: azure-resourcemanager-imagebuilder
      cmderr	[Inst] 2021-11-11 05:45:32 DEBUG Got artifact: pom.xml
      cmderr	[Inst] 2021-11-11 05:45:32 DEBUG Got artifact: azure-resourcemanager-imagebuilder-1.0.0-beta.2.jar
      cmderr	[Inst] 2021-11-11 05:45:32 DEBUG Match jar package: azure-resourcemanager-imagebuilder-1.0.0-beta.2.jar
      cmderr	[Inst] 2021-11-11 05:45:32 DEBUG output: {"full": "```sh\ncurl -L \"https://portal.azure-devex-tools.com/api/sdk-dl-pub?p=Azure/16725/azure-sdk-for-java/azure-resourcemanager-imagebuilder/azure-resourcemanager-imagebuilder-1.0.0-beta.2.jar\" -o azure-resourcemanager-imagebuilder-1.0.0-beta.2.jar\nmvn install:install-file -DgroupId=com.azure.resourcemanager -DartifactId=azure-resourcemanager-imagebuilder -Dversion=1.0.0-beta.0 -Dfile=azure-resourcemanager-imagebuilder-1.0.0-beta.2.jar -Dpackaging=jar -DgeneratePom=true
      ```"}
    ️️✔️ azure-sdk-for-go succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    • ️✔️Succeeded [Logs]Release - Generate from 3d21367. SDK Automation 14.0.0
      command	sh ./eng/initScript.sh ../../../../../azure-sdk-for-go_tmp/initInput.json ../../../../../azure-sdk-for-go_tmp/initOutput.json
      command	generator automation ../../../../../azure-sdk-for-go_tmp/generateInput.json ../../../../../azure-sdk-for-go_tmp/generateOutput.json
    • ️✔️virtualmachineimagebuilder/mgmt/2020-02-14/virtualmachineimagebuilder [View full logs]  [Release SDK Changes]
      info	[Changelog] No exported changes
    • ️✔️preview/virtualmachineimagebuilder/mgmt/2019-05-01-preview/virtualmachineimagebuilder [View full logs
      info	[Changelog] No exported changes
    • ️✔️preview/virtualmachineimagebuilder/mgmt/2019-02-01-preview/virtualmachineimagebuilder [View full logs
      info	[Changelog] No exported changes
    • ️✔️preview/virtualmachineimagebuilder/mgmt/2018-02-01-preview/virtualmachineimagebuilder [View full logs
      info	[Changelog] No exported changes
    ️️✔️ azure-sdk-for-js succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    • ️✔️Succeeded [Logs]Release - Generate from 3d21367. SDK Automation 14.0.0
      warn	Skip initScript due to not configured
      command	autorest --version=V2 --typescript --license-header=MICROSOFT_MIT_NO_VERSION [email protected]/[email protected] --typescript-sdks-folder=/home/vsts/work/1/s/azure-sdk-for-js/azure-sdk-for-js ../../azure-rest-api-specs/specification/imagebuilder/resource-manager/readme.md
    • ️✔️@azure/arm-imagebuilder [View full logs]  [Release SDK Changes]
      cmderr	[npmPack] loaded rollup.config.js with warnings
      cmderr	[npmPack] (!) Unused external imports
      cmderr	[npmPack] default imported from external module 'rollup' but never used
      cmderr	[npmPack] ./esm/imageBuilderClient.js → ./dist/arm-imagebuilder.js...
      cmderr	[npmPack] created ./dist/arm-imagebuilder.js in 308ms
    ️⚠️ azure-resource-manager-schemas warning [Detail]
    • ⚠️Warning [Logs]Release - Generate from 3d21367. Schema Automation 14.0.0
      command	.sdkauto/initScript.sh ../azure-resource-manager-schemas_tmp/initInput.json ../azure-resource-manager-schemas_tmp/initOutput.json
      cmderr	[initScript.sh] WARN old lockfile
      cmderr	[initScript.sh] npm WARN old lockfile The package-lock.json file was created with an old version of npm,
      cmderr	[initScript.sh] npm WARN old lockfile so supplemental metadata must be fetched from the registry.
      cmderr	[initScript.sh] npm WARN old lockfile
      cmderr	[initScript.sh] npm WARN old lockfile This is a one-time fix-up, please be patient...
      cmderr	[initScript.sh] npm WARN old lockfile
      warn	File azure-resource-manager-schemas_tmp/initOutput.json not found to read
      command	.sdkauto/generateScript.sh ../azure-resource-manager-schemas_tmp/generateInput.json ../azure-resource-manager-schemas_tmp/generateOutput.json
      cmderr	[generateScript.sh] (node:2800) UnhandledPromiseRejectionWarning: SyntaxError: Unexpected end of JSON input
      cmderr	[generateScript.sh]     at JSON.parse (<anonymous>)
      cmderr	[generateScript.sh]     at Object.readJsonFile (/home/vsts/work/1/s/azure-resource-manager-schemas/generator/utils.ts:176:17)
      cmderr	[generateScript.sh]     at getCurrentTemplateRefs (/home/vsts/work/1/s/azure-resource-manager-schemas/generator/generate.ts:293:21)
      cmderr	[generateScript.sh]     at /home/vsts/work/1/s/azure-resource-manager-schemas/generator/generate.ts:300:29
      cmderr	[generateScript.sh] (Use `node --trace-warnings ...` to show where the warning was created)
      cmderr	[generateScript.sh] (node:2800) UnhandledPromiseRejectionWarning: Unhandled promise rejection. This error originated either by throwing inside of an async function without a catch block, or by rejecting a promise which was not handled with .catch(). To terminate the node process on unhandled promise rejection, use the CLI flag `--unhandled-rejections=strict` (see https://nodejs.org/api/cli.html#cli_unhandled_rejections_mode). (rejection id: 1)
      cmderr	[generateScript.sh] (node:2800) [DEP0018] DeprecationWarning: Unhandled promise rejections are deprecated. In the future, promise rejections that are not handled will terminate the Node.js process with a non-zero exit code.
    • ️✔️imagebuilder [View full logs]  [Release Schema Changes]
    Posted by Swagger Pipeline | How to fix these errors?

    @ArcturusZhang ArcturusZhang merged commit 3d21367 into Azure:main Nov 11, 2021
    ghost pushed a commit to Azure/azure-resource-manager-schemas that referenced this pull request Nov 11, 2021
    LeiWang3 pushed a commit to LeiWang3/azure-rest-api-specs that referenced this pull request Mar 31, 2022
    …add version stable/2020-02-14 (Azure#16725)
    
    * update description for build vm size
    
    * finalize str
    
    Co-authored-by: rez1 <[email protected]>
    Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
    Labels
    None yet
    Projects
    None yet
    Development

    Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

    2 participants