Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Azure.Identity Conceptual Docs (with language-specific code samples) #5898

Closed
joshfree opened this issue Oct 28, 2019 · 3 comments · Fixed by #5837
Closed

Azure.Identity Conceptual Docs (with language-specific code samples) #5898

joshfree opened this issue Oct 28, 2019 · 3 comments · Fixed by #5837
Assignees
Labels
Azure.Identity Client This issue points to a problem in the data-plane of the library. Docs

Comments

@joshfree
Copy link
Member

This is a tracking item to finish writing Conceptual Documentation for Identity before the November SDK update.

This is something @ellismg began last week, but it needs to be expanded with language-specific code samples as well.

Per offline discussion, this conceptual docs will be PR'd to all 4 repos and each language-specific package owner will fill-in the language-specific portion in the markdown / docs

Related: Azure/azure-sdk-for-java#6062 Azure/azure-sdk-for-net#8488

@joshfree
Copy link
Member Author

Removing blocking-release as this is purely documentation that does not impact the shipping package.

@joshfree
Copy link
Member Author

joshfree commented Jan 3, 2020

Reactivating based on planning discussion in late-December. @ellismg is driving Identity conceptual documentation push across all azure-sdk languages

@sophiajt
Copy link
Contributor

sophiajt commented Jan 5, 2020

@joshfree - to reactive, should we reopen issue?

@github-actions github-actions bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Apr 12, 2023
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
Azure.Identity Client This issue points to a problem in the data-plane of the library. Docs
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants