-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 209
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Handle additional property formats #2503
Comments
@matthchr can I take it and do it? should I know something more about these fields? |
You're welcome to take this issue and do it. We already handle a bunch of formats - typically, a format gets translated into an underlying type (e.g. |
@theunrepentantgeek can you help me and tell me where or how I can generate a config file for the code generator? or can you attach some an example? |
Apologies @PawelHaracz, somehow I missed your message. 😢 If you're still interested (no problem if you're not), I'd suggest reusing the existing configuration file for the generator -
When the data format is handled, you should see a few small changes in the generated code under |
Thank you for your respons. Of course, I want to still try to help you. I gonna try to use this clip and resolve the issue 😃 |
We're still interested in doing this, although to date we haven't seen many issues with lack of this support. |
No change from above. |
We still want this. The code has moved to line 270. |
Describe the current behavior
During run of the code generator, we get warnings about unsupported property formats:
Describe the improvement
We should add proper support for these formats so that our CRDs properly validate up front.
Additional context
This may technically be a breaking change, as we'll be rejecting values previously accepted - but given they would then be rejected by ARM, I don't think this will negatively impact any current users.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: