You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
As rust-gpu doesn't support access specifiers for storage buffers, bevy panics with the following error when trying to load a shader that accesses its lighting data:
ERROR wgpu::backend::direct: Handling wgpu errors as fatal by default
thread 'main' panicked at 'wgpu error: Validation Error
Caused by:
In Device::create_render_pipeline
note: label = `rust_gpu_pbr_opaque_mesh_pipeline`
error matching FRAGMENT shader requirements against the pipeline
shader global ResourceBinding { group: 0, binding: 6 } is not available in the layout pipeline layout
storage class Storage { access: LOAD } doesn't match the shader Uniform
', /home/josh/.cargo/registry/src/jackfan.us.kg-1ecc6299db9ec823/wgpu-0.14.2/src/backend/direct.rs:2403:5
note: run with `RUST_BACKTRACE=1` environment variable to display a backtrace
This can be worked around by forcibly disabling storage buffers via WgpuSettings (which is default behaviour in the current BevyRustGpuPlugin), but precludes their usage entirely, which is not ideal given that read / write storage buffers are viable.
In theory it would also be possible to remedy this on the bevy side, but that doesn't seem appropriate given that their lighting system is read-only as per GPU usage idioms. Patching in a read-write option for the sake of making a third-party crate's workaround viable isn't a great reason to do it.
As
rust-gpu
doesn't support access specifiers for storage buffers, bevy panics with the following error when trying to load a shader that accesses its lighting data:This can be worked around by forcibly disabling storage buffers via
WgpuSettings
(which is default behaviour in the currentBevyRustGpuPlugin
), but precludes their usage entirely, which is not ideal given that read / write storage buffers are viable.Upstream tracking issue: rust-gpu/#689
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: