-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 23
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Calculation 259 and Cooling #112
Comments
This is the setting for calculation 259:
Hence, it might not indicate that the cooling is running, but at least that the cooling is allowed? |
At least for me those three calculations are currently:
I'm running |
Yes, but these are exactly the transformed values of the raw value
I am at @ALL: Does anybody get a value of |
For me the values currently are:
So, yeah, it is However the other values (117-119) are still "wrong":
The display on the controller itself is showing So probably this is another case for something that needs to be corrected on a "higher level" (similar to #84). |
Nope, Value 80 is
This is using |
@kbabioch @RobinFlikkema : Which kind of heat pump do you have? Does your heat pump uses the compressor for cooling? I have a brine/water heat pump which does not use the compressor for cooling. Looking at the firmware, it might be the case that calculation 80 can only turn 7 if the compressor is used for cooling...? |
I have a LWAV 82R1/3, which is an air to water heat pump. It uses the compressor to cool down the water running through the heating system. So your assumption might be correct. Potentially this is something that should be reported to Alpha Innotec. On the other hand the parameters are not an official feature anyway. Maybe we can reproduce this in some other interface (BACNet, Modbus)? |
In the "offical" web server of the heat pump, there is However, |
Okay, haven't noticed, since my heat pump is not installed as "steuerbarer Verbraucher".
From my point of view that is another case that could be handled on a "higher level", i.e. we should not try to be too clever with those low level parameters / calcaulations / visibilities, but do any kind of conversion in a different layer. I will prepare an issue for that to collect currently known glitches and requirements for the "high level interface". |
I do not see any easy way to check whether the (passive) cooling (i.e., without the heat pump) is running. The safest way seems to be to check whether the calculation 66 |
Which might be a valid approach for the high level interface. A function / property like |
Brine/Water. That would explain it. It's an Alpha Innotec 62K3M |
I would like to guess that calculation 259 is related to cooling:
Today, I turned on cooling and I was surprised that calculation 80 stayed at "no request" and did not turn to "cooling". However, calculation 259 switched from 0 to 1.
Btw: for me, calculations 117-119 always give a 0 for me. (Even if I go to the heat pump and select the screen where these three lines pop up at the display.)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: