-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
likely broken github actions release workflow #2285
Comments
I'm not sure what's going on with Cross to be honest, but the issue you linked seems specific to Windows. So the release workflow might need to be updated to not use But ripgrep builds musl and arm targets. Using cross there is a big advantage. Your CI release doesn't produce arm builds, so you don't care about Cross for that. You do have musl builds, which you make possible by explicitly installing I'll leave this open since it looks like there's probably some work/testing to be done. And I have contemplated moving off of Cross because of the recent changes, but setting up cross compiler toolchains is no fun either. |
Yeah, the normal CI only uses Cross when ripgrep/.github/workflows/ci.yml Line 106 in 387df97
But the release workflow uses Cross unconditionally. I'm not sure why that difference exists, but I'd guess that the release workflow should also have |
The release was indeed broken for this reason and others. I ended up doing some fairly extensive surgery, but it should be working again. |
Describe your bug.
cross-rs
changed it's behavior, which will break the release.yml workflow.I fixed this on my use case by deprecating
cross-rs
and just building on the native workers, if that works forripgrep
I can try submitting a PR similar to what I did.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: