You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Should the annotations pipeline be able to handle both gtfs with a gene_type and gene_biotype annotation? At the moment only gene_biotype is supported. Gene_type is ignored and the biotype is fetched from the source column instead.
At the moment the following code exists in gtf2gtf: if "gene_biotype" not in gff.attributes: gff.setAttribute("gene_biotype", gff.source)
Should we be able to handle both formats or is this unlikely to bother anyone in the future?
ENCODE uses "gene_type".
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Should the annotations pipeline be able to handle both gtfs with a gene_type and gene_biotype annotation? At the moment only gene_biotype is supported. Gene_type is ignored and the biotype is fetched from the source column instead.
At the moment the following code exists in gtf2gtf:
if "gene_biotype" not in gff.attributes: gff.setAttribute("gene_biotype", gff.source)
Should we be able to handle both formats or is this unlikely to bother anyone in the future?
ENCODE uses "gene_type".
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: