Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

annotations_pipeline: gene_biotype vs gene_type #329

Closed
jscaber opened this issue May 2, 2017 · 2 comments
Closed

annotations_pipeline: gene_biotype vs gene_type #329

jscaber opened this issue May 2, 2017 · 2 comments

Comments

@jscaber
Copy link
Member

jscaber commented May 2, 2017

Should the annotations pipeline be able to handle both gtfs with a gene_type and gene_biotype annotation? At the moment only gene_biotype is supported. Gene_type is ignored and the biotype is fetched from the source column instead.

At the moment the following code exists in gtf2gtf:
if "gene_biotype" not in gff.attributes: gff.setAttribute("gene_biotype", gff.source)

Should we be able to handle both formats or is this unlikely to bother anyone in the future?
ENCODE uses "gene_type".

@sebastian-luna-valero
Copy link
Member

Hi @jscaber

Have you had a look at CGATOxford/CGATPipelines#323

@Acribbs
Copy link
Member

Acribbs commented Nov 15, 2017

I think this should be solved with the new pipeline. If im wrong please open it again.

@Acribbs Acribbs closed this as completed Nov 15, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants