You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hello,
The question is in the title. Why are some of the overloaded methods having a "_s" suffix.
For example : TDataStd_Name has a Set method and two Set_s methods.
It's sometimes confusing because if we use the Set method the code will fail due to type error. (i.e the arguments aren't passed as the right overloaded method)
More important, is this random ? And can it change depending on the OCP version?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hello,
The question is in the title. Why are some of the overloaded methods having a "_s" suffix.
For example :
TDataStd_Name
has aSet
method and twoSet_s
methods.It's sometimes confusing because if we use the
Set
method the code will fail due to type error. (i.e the arguments aren't passed as the right overloaded method)More important, is this random ? And can it change depending on the OCP version?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: