-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 206
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Documentation 2.0 #3672
Comments
Here are some thoughts for the grid and fields tutorial: Grids tutorial
Q: should we show tripolar grid / other examples with Fields tutorial
What else? |
Visualization always helps, so I recommend adding plots of various grid types (periodic, non-periodic, stretched, etc.) directly below the corresponding code snippets that generate them. Additionally, it would be nice to illustrate how to access the different components of |
I vote yes to including tripolar. |
I think we should also have a tutorial for |
This issue describes an overhaul / refactoring of the "Model setup" part of the documentation. We've noticed that while our examples and docstrings seem to be useful, the "model setup" is less so, and also leaves out a lot of information necessary for running more complex simulations.
What we have now
The basic idea is to flatten the current structure a bit. Right now it reads:
What we propose
We propose to create top-level sections for important concepts such as
Grids
,Fields
,Simulations
etc. Then less important details would be subsumed into theModels
section (which would overlap strongly with the currentModel setup
section).Here's an outline:
The ordering of subjects is carefully chosen here, so please comment on that if you think it should be changed.
To do this incrementally, I will open a PR that adds the
Grids
andFields
sections. Then we can build theModels
section incrementally by porting material fromModel setup
. While we are working I will add the qualiferModel setup (legacy)
.Related issues:
closure
to models #1879cc @simone-silvestri @seamanticscience @sandreza @rafferrari @navidcy @siddharthabishnu
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: