-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 27
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
a question about Radio Buttons instead of Checkboxes #3
Comments
Radio buttons would be better. It's certainly possible but we ran up against the budget we had for this project. If you implement them, submit a pull request. |
We're using radio buttons in some fields and check boxes in other fields here: https://findwebhosting.web.illinois.edu/finder - It depends on which you select during the taxonomy creation process which effect you'll get. I was somewhat confused by why they were all displaying as checkboxes even when radio functionality was enabled, but haven't been able to figure out the origin there. But the functionality is available! |
My apologies if this is really a simple question. I have installed the module, created services, taxonomy, etc., but when I go to the finder module on my site, No services or questions show up? Anything I should be looking for? I created all the services as described. One note, when I go into the Finder configuration page and change the default headings, etc...they don't seem to be appearing on the finder page either. Almost like I am looking at the wrong finder page??? Running Drupal on my Mac using MAMP, configuration attached. thanks for any help. Steve |
Hi CU, your Finder is an excellent tool. I am hoping we can use it too to solve the same problem, will be glad to cite your tool on our pages.
I am wondering if you have investigated if it is possible to use RadioButtons in the criteria lists? I briefly scanned the Drupal docs, but I am not seeing specific support for Radio buttons, do you know if it would be possible? Checkboxes don't convey visually the mutually exclusiveness of some criteria. thanks.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: