Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

It really surprised me a lot #102

Open
Breezewrf opened this issue Sep 15, 2022 · 1 comment
Open

It really surprised me a lot #102

Breezewrf opened this issue Sep 15, 2022 · 1 comment

Comments

@Breezewrf
Copy link

after my "training" on restoration task, I am curious about the loss function -- mse, the parameters including both restoration generated image and ground truth, some minutes after, a function training was finished,
and when I add a watermark different from further one, result as following:

Screenshot from 2022-09-15 14-27-52

last, as far as I am concerned, this algorithm is unrealistic, on the other hand, maybe I have mistaken something because I just met this project yesterday

@arnavmehta7
Copy link

thats because you need to bitwise_not(mask)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants