-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Allow physical metadata to be defined in a template #107
Comments
This solution seems workable to me as we could produce and maintain the template in an automated fashion and then simply drop it in place in our assembly line workflow. It would also allow us to track the template in our GitHub repositories for each package. |
The proposed template is https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1dMbGtbmfVzUWUR0TyMUFHtkdrIckXc_-nRwKpoqkUmY/edit?usp=sharing |
Looks good to me. In the scenario where we transfer files to EDI out of band (because we can't host them), would the other entity URL be left blank? Or does EML require it? |
You're right @joefutrelle, in that case the URL field would be blank or |
Perfect. |
make_eml()
requires access to data files so physical metadata (e.g. file size, checksum, etc.) can be calculated and the user doesn't have to deal with this minutiae. In some cases this requirement is unnecessarily prohibitive (e.g. large unchanged data files stored in a remote location) or prevents the user from overriding EAL assumptions (e.g. formatName estimated from file extension).A possible solution is to store this physical metadata in a new metadata template that can be created before running
make_eml()
or left absent in the case where a user wants the values calculated for them, as is currently done.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: