We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
dayfox
dayfox's colored texts are much harder to read than nightfox. All primary colors from dayfox except black failed the contrast requirement of WCAG AA level. Example of red v.s. background: https://webaim.org/resources/contrastchecker/?fcolor=B95D76&bcolor=EAEAEA
nightfox
Expected behavior Colored texts using dayfox should be as easy to read as nightfox.
Screenshots README's picture seems convincing enough.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I do agree that dayfox does need some updates to make it more contrasting. I will try and do a pass over it to make it more contrasting.
Sorry, something went wrong.
BTW, there are also colors in other themes having low contrasts, including red v.s. background and comment v.s. background in nightfox.
I preferred the previous "dayfox". Please do not update "dawnfox":) I'm now using it.
For those that want to use the old dayfox you can use tag v2.1.0.
For those that want to use the old dayfox check this comment on how to override it back.
EdenEast
Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.
Description
dayfox
's colored texts are much harder to read thannightfox
.All primary colors from
dayfox
except black failed the contrast requirement of WCAG AA level.Example of red v.s. background: https://webaim.org/resources/contrastchecker/?fcolor=B95D76&bcolor=EAEAEA
Behavior
Expected behavior
Colored texts using
dayfox
should be as easy to read asnightfox
.Screenshots
README's picture seems convincing enough.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: