Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

EPSG and ESRI are using different ellipsoid for POSGAR (2007 and 94) CRS #49

Closed
phaarnes opened this issue Jul 13, 2023 · 2 comments
Closed

Comments

@phaarnes
Copy link

phaarnes commented Jul 13, 2023

Hi,

In the definition of CRS POSGAR 2007, there are discrepancies between EPSG and ESRI.

According to the EPSG database, this CRS uses WGS 84 as an ellipsoid. According to ESRI PE, GRS 80 is used.

See POSGAR 2007 (EPSG:5340) for instance.

In pe_list_geogcs.txt the definition of this CRS is given as:

GEOGCS["GCS_POSGAR_2007",
    DATUM["D_POSGAR_2007",
    SPHEROID["GRS_1980", 6378137.0, 298.257222101]],
    PRIMEM["Greenwich", 0.0],
    UNIT["Degree", 0.0174532925199433]]

It's the same case for POSGAR 94 (EPSG:4694)

GEOGCS["GCS_POSGAR_1994",
     DATUM["D_POSGAR_1994",
     SPHEROID["GRS_1980", 6378137.0, 298.257222101]],
     PRIMEM["Greenwich", 0.0],
     UNIT["Degree", 0.0174532925199433]]
@phaarnes phaarnes changed the title Discrepancies between EPSG and ESRI for POSGAR 2007 EPSG and ESRI are using different ellipsoid for POSGAR 2007 Jul 13, 2023
@phaarnes phaarnes changed the title EPSG and ESRI are using different ellipsoid for POSGAR 2007 EPSG and ESRI are using different ellipsoid for POSGAR (2007 and 94) CRS Jul 13, 2023
@melitakennedy
Copy link

Thank you for reporting this! We have several, usually very old, discrepancies where EPSG updated the definitions with a minor update and we didn't at the time. We plan on updating these in the current release, hopefully (ArcGIS Pro 3.2).

@beuan
Copy link
Collaborator

beuan commented Oct 27, 2023

Thank you, @phaarnes, for your feedback. Your issue should be resolved with our latest install (Update for ArcGIS Pro 3.2 #53).

@beuan beuan closed this as completed Oct 27, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants