[HOLD for payment 2023-10-23] Distance - The merchant is displayed on the distance request page but not on the request report

[kbecciv]

If you haven’t already, check out our contributing guidelines for onboarding and email [email protected] to request to join our Slack channel!

---

Version Number: 1.3.81.5
Reproducible in staging?: y
Reproducible in production?: n
If this was caught during regression testing, add the test name, ID and link from TestRail:
Email or phone of affected tester (no customers):
Logs: https://stackoverflow.com/c/expensify/questions/4856
Expensify/Expensify Issue URL:
Issue reported by: @jo-ui
Slack conversation: https://expensify.slack.com/archives/C049HHMV9SM/p1697045740106739

Action Performed:

1. Open request money
2. Change tab to distance
3. Enter start and finish location
4. Select workspace
5. Notice the merchant value is shown
6. Send the request
7. Open the request

Expected Result:

Merchant value should not be shown on the distance page or it should also be visible on the request report page

Actual Result:

The Merchant value is displayed on distance request page but not on the request report page

Workaround:

Unknown

Platforms:

Which of our officially supported platforms is this issue occurring on?

• Android: Native
• Android: mWeb Chrome
• iOS: Native
• iOS: mWeb Safari
• MacOS: Chrome / Safari
• MacOS: Desktop

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native

20231011_214209.mp4

Android: mWeb Chrome

20231011_213559.mp4

iOS: Native

iOS: mWeb Safari

MacOS: Chrome / Safari

2023-10-11.21-31-06.mp4

Recording.4959.mp4

MacOS: Desktop

merchant.mp4

View all open jobs on GitHub

Upwork Automation - Do Not Edit

• Upwork Job URL: https://www.upwork.com/jobs/~019f6b2700f396ce6a
• Upwork Job ID: 1712195602319327232
• Last Price Increase: 2023-10-11

[melvin-bot]

Triggered auto assignment to @mallenexpensify (Bug), see https://stackoverflow.com/c/expensify/questions/14418 for more details.

[melvin-bot]

Job added to Upwork: https://www.upwork.com/jobs/~019f6b2700f396ce6a

[melvin-bot]

Bug0 Triage Checklist (Main S/O)

• This "bug" occurs on a supported platform (ensure Platforms in OP are ✅)
• This bug is not a duplicate report (check E/App issues and #expensify-bugs)
  • If it is, comment with a link to the original report, close the issue and add any novel details to the original issue instead
• This bug is reproducible using the reproduction steps in the OP. S/O
  • If the reproduction steps are clear and you're unable to reproduce the bug, check with the reporter and QA first, then close the issue.
  • If the reproduction steps aren't clear and you determine the correct steps, please update the OP.
• This issue is filled out as thoroughly and clearly as possible
  • Pay special attention to the title, results, platforms where the bug occurs, and if the bug happens on staging/production.
• I have reviewed and subscribed to the linked Slack conversation to ensure Slack/Github stay in sync

[melvin-bot]

Triggered auto assignment to Contributor-plus team member for initial proposal review - @ntdiary (External)

[b4s36t4]

@kbecciv I think you mis-matched issue with the steps. Can you check?

[melvin-bot]

Current assignee @mallenexpensify is eligible for the Bug assigner, not assigning anyone new.

[melvin-bot]

Bug0 Triage Checklist (Main S/O)

• This "bug" occurs on a supported platform (ensure Platforms in OP are ✅)
• This bug is not a duplicate report (check E/App issues and #expensify-bugs)
  • If it is, comment with a link to the original report, close the issue and add any novel details to the original issue instead
• This bug is reproducible using the reproduction steps in the OP. S/O
  • If the reproduction steps are clear and you're unable to reproduce the bug, check with the reporter and QA first, then close the issue.
  • If the reproduction steps aren't clear and you determine the correct steps, please update the OP.
• This issue is filled out as thoroughly and clearly as possible
  • Pay special attention to the title, results, platforms where the bug occurs, and if the bug happens on staging/production.
• I have reviewed and subscribed to the linked Slack conversation to ensure Slack/Github stay in sync

[OSBotify]

👋 Friendly reminder that deploy blockers are time-sensitive ⏱ issues! Check out the open StagingDeployCash deploy checklist to see the list of PRs included in this release, then work quickly to do one of the following:

1. Identify the pull request that introduced this issue and revert it.
2. Find someone who can quickly fix the issue.
3. Fix the issue yourself.

[melvin-bot]

Triggered auto assignment to @francoisl (Engineering), see https://stackoverflow.com/c/expensify/questions/4319 for more details.

[francoisl]

@kbecciv I think you mis-matched issue with the steps. Can you check?

Yep those looked accidentally mixed up, I updated the steps.

[melvin-bot]

The solution for this issue has been 🚀 deployed to production 🚀 in version 1.3.83-11 and is now subject to a 7-day regression period 📆. Here is the list of pull requests that resolve this issue:

• Don't show duplicate merchant input for distance requests #29388

If no regressions arise, payment will be issued on 2023-10-20. 🎊

After the hold period is over and BZ checklist items are completed, please complete any of the applicable payments for this issue, and check them off once done.

• External issue reporter
• Contributor that fixed the issue
• Contributor+ that helped on the issue and/or PR

For reference, here are some details about the assignees on this issue:

• @ntdiary requires payment
• @jo-ui requires payment

As a reminder, here are the bonuses/penalties that should be applied for any External issue:

• Merged PR within 3 business days of assignment - 50% bonus
• Merged PR more than 9 business days after assignment - 50% penalty

[melvin-bot]

BugZero Checklist: The PR fixing this issue has been merged! The following checklist (instructions) will need to be completed before the issue can be closed:

• [@ntdiary] The PR that introduced the bug has been identified. Link to the PR:
• [@ntdiary] The offending PR has been commented on, pointing out the bug it caused and why, so the author and reviewers can learn from the mistake. Link to comment:
• [@ntdiary] A discussion in #expensify-bugs has been started about whether any other steps should be taken (e.g. updating the PR review checklist) in order to catch this type of bug sooner. Link to discussion:
• [@ntdiary] Determine if we should create a regression test for this bug.
• [@ntdiary] If we decide to create a regression test for the bug, please propose the regression test steps to ensure the same bug will not reach production again.
• [@mallenexpensify] Link the GH issue for creating/updating the regression test once above steps have been agreed upon:

[melvin-bot]

The solution for this issue has been 🚀 deployed to production 🚀 in version 1.3.83-11 and is now subject to a 7-day regression period 📆. Here is the list of pull requests that resolve this issue:

• Don't show duplicate merchant input for distance requests #29388

If no regressions arise, payment will be issued on 2023-10-20. 🎊

After the hold period is over and BZ checklist items are completed, please complete any of the applicable payments for this issue, and check them off once done.

• External issue reporter
• Contributor that fixed the issue
• Contributor+ that helped on the issue and/or PR

For reference, here are some details about the assignees on this issue:

• @ntdiary requires payment
• @jo-ui requires payment

As a reminder, here are the bonuses/penalties that should be applied for any External issue:

• Merged PR within 3 business days of assignment - 50% bonus
• Merged PR more than 9 business days after assignment - 50% penalty

[melvin-bot]

BugZero Checklist: The PR fixing this issue has been merged! The following checklist (instructions) will need to be completed before the issue can be closed:

• [@ntdiary] The PR that introduced the bug has been identified. Link to the PR:
• [@ntdiary] The offending PR has been commented on, pointing out the bug it caused and why, so the author and reviewers can learn from the mistake. Link to comment:
• [@ntdiary] A discussion in #expensify-bugs has been started about whether any other steps should be taken (e.g. updating the PR review checklist) in order to catch this type of bug sooner. Link to discussion:
• [@ntdiary] Determine if we should create a regression test for this bug.
• [@ntdiary] If we decide to create a regression test for the bug, please propose the regression test steps to ensure the same bug will not reach production again.
• [@mallenexpensify] Link the GH issue for creating/updating the regression test once above steps have been agreed upon:

[melvin-bot]

The solution for this issue has been 🚀 deployed to production 🚀 in version 1.3.84-10 and is now subject to a 7-day regression period 📆. Here is the list of pull requests that resolve this issue:

• Don't show duplicate merchant input for distance requests #29388

If no regressions arise, payment will be issued on 2023-10-23. 🎊

After the hold period is over and BZ checklist items are completed, please complete any of the applicable payments for this issue, and check them off once done.

• External issue reporter
• Contributor that fixed the issue
• Contributor+ that helped on the issue and/or PR

For reference, here are some details about the assignees on this issue:

• @ntdiary requires payment
• @jo-ui requires payment

As a reminder, here are the bonuses/penalties that should be applied for any External issue:

• Merged PR within 3 business days of assignment - 50% bonus
• Merged PR more than 9 business days after assignment - 50% penalty

[melvin-bot]

BugZero Checklist: The PR fixing this issue has been merged! The following checklist (instructions) will need to be completed before the issue can be closed:

• [@ntdiary] The PR that introduced the bug has been identified. Link to the PR:
• [@ntdiary] The offending PR has been commented on, pointing out the bug it caused and why, so the author and reviewers can learn from the mistake. Link to comment:
• [@ntdiary] A discussion in #expensify-bugs has been started about whether any other steps should be taken (e.g. updating the PR review checklist) in order to catch this type of bug sooner. Link to discussion:
• [@ntdiary] Determine if we should create a regression test for this bug.
• [@ntdiary] If we decide to create a regression test for the bug, please propose the regression test steps to ensure the same bug will not reach production again.
• [@mallenexpensify] Link the GH issue for creating/updating the regression test once above steps have been agreed upon:

[melvin-bot]

The solution for this issue has been 🚀 deployed to production 🚀 in version 1.3.84-10 and is now subject to a 7-day regression period 📆. Here is the list of pull requests that resolve this issue:

• Don't show duplicate merchant input for distance requests #29388

If no regressions arise, payment will be issued on 2023-10-23. 🎊

After the hold period is over and BZ checklist items are completed, please complete any of the applicable payments for this issue, and check them off once done.

• External issue reporter
• Contributor that fixed the issue
• Contributor+ that helped on the issue and/or PR

For reference, here are some details about the assignees on this issue:

• @ntdiary requires payment
• @jo-ui requires payment

As a reminder, here are the bonuses/penalties that should be applied for any External issue:

• Merged PR within 3 business days of assignment - 50% bonus
• Merged PR more than 9 business days after assignment - 50% penalty

[melvin-bot]

BugZero Checklist: The PR fixing this issue has been merged! The following checklist (instructions) will need to be completed before the issue can be closed:

• [@ntdiary] The PR that introduced the bug has been identified. Link to the PR:
• [@ntdiary] The offending PR has been commented on, pointing out the bug it caused and why, so the author and reviewers can learn from the mistake. Link to comment:
• [@ntdiary] A discussion in #expensify-bugs has been started about whether any other steps should be taken (e.g. updating the PR review checklist) in order to catch this type of bug sooner. Link to discussion:
• [@ntdiary] Determine if we should create a regression test for this bug.
• [@ntdiary] If we decide to create a regression test for the bug, please propose the regression test steps to ensure the same bug will not reach production again.
• [@mallenexpensify] Link the GH issue for creating/updating the regression test once above steps have been agreed upon:

[melvin-bot]

@francoisl, @ntdiary, @mallenexpensify Whoops! This issue is 2 days overdue. Let's get this updated quick!

[mallenexpensify]

Issue reporter: @jo-ui paid $50 via Upwork
Contributor: N/A
Contributor+: @ntdiary paid $500 via Upwork.

@jo-ui and @ntdiary , can you please accept the job and reply here once you have?
https://www.upwork.com/jobs/~019f6b2700f396ce6a

Also... @jo-ui, nice suit in your profile pic!

[ntdiary]

BugZero Checklist: The PR fixing this issue has been merged! The following checklist (instructions) will need to be completed before the issue can be closed:

• [@ntdiary] The PR that introduced the bug has been identified. Link to the PR: Add Scan to Split Bill and implement IOU action startSplitBill #28710
• [@ntdiary] The offending PR has been commented on, pointing out the bug it caused and why, so the author and reviewers can learn from the mistake. Link to comment: https://github.com/Expensify/App/pull/28710/files#r1369448249
• [@ntdiary] A discussion in #expensify-bugs has been started about whether any other steps should be taken (e.g. updating the PR review checklist) in order to catch this type of bug sooner. Link to discussion: No need
• [@ntdiary] Determine if we should create a regression test for this bug. No need
• [@ntdiary] If we decide to create a regression test for the bug, please propose the regression test steps to ensure the same bug will not reach production again. No need
• [@mallenexpensify] Link the GH issue for creating/updating the regression test once above steps have been agreed upon:

We have related check item in the review list, I guess it's just that the linked PR is relatively large, so this detail was accidentally overlooked

• I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar have been tested & I retested again)

[ntdiary]

Issue reporter: @jo-ui due $50 via Upwork Contributor: N/A Contributor+: @ntdiary due $500 via Upwork.

@jo-ui and @ntdiary , can you please accept the job and reply here once you have? https://www.upwork.com/jobs/~019f6b2700f396ce6a

Also... @jo-ui, nice suit in your profile pic!

@mallenexpensify, thank you! Have accepted. : )

[jo-ui]

Issue reporter: @jo-ui due $50 via Upwork
Contributor: N/A
Contributor+: @ntdiary due $500 via Upwork.

@jo-ui and @ntdiary , can you please accept the job and reply here once you have?
https://www.upwork.com/jobs/~019f6b2700f396ce6a

Also... @jo-ui, nice suit in your profile pic!

@mallenexpensify thank you, I've accepted the offer on upwork

[mallenexpensify]

Thanks @ntdiary and @jo-ui , you've both been paid, updated the comment above has been updated to show payment