Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Due for payment 2025-03-10] [$50][Simplified Actions] [Internal] Update report action copies #57442

Open
luacmartins opened this issue Feb 26, 2025 · 5 comments
Assignees
Labels
Awaiting Payment Auto-added when associated PR is deployed to production Internal Requires API changes or must be handled by Expensify staff NewFeature Something to build that is a new item. Weekly KSv2

Comments

@luacmartins
Copy link
Contributor

luacmartins commented Feb 26, 2025

Implement this section of the #migrate: Simplified actions framework for all reports design doc

Issue OwnerCurrent Issue Owner: @MitchExpensify
@luacmartins luacmartins added Daily KSv2 NewFeature Something to build that is a new item. labels Feb 26, 2025
@luacmartins luacmartins self-assigned this Feb 26, 2025
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Feb 26, 2025

Triggered auto assignment to @MitchExpensify (NewFeature), see https://stackoverflowteams.com/c/expensify/questions/14418#:~:text=BugZero%20process%20steps%20for%20feature%20requests for more details. Please add this Feature request to a GH project, as outlined in the SO.

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot added Weekly KSv2 and removed Daily KSv2 labels Feb 26, 2025
@luacmartins luacmartins added Daily KSv2 Internal Requires API changes or must be handled by Expensify staff and removed Weekly KSv2 labels Feb 26, 2025
@luacmartins luacmartins changed the title [Simplified Actions] [Internal] Update report action copies [$50][Simplified Actions] [Internal] Update report action copies Feb 26, 2025
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Feb 26, 2025

⚠️ Could not update price automatically because there is no linked Upwork Job ID. The BZ team member will need to update the price manually in Upwork.

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot added Reviewing Has a PR in review Weekly KSv2 and removed Daily KSv2 labels Feb 26, 2025
@luacmartins luacmartins assigned ZhenjaHorbach and rlinoz and unassigned rlinoz Feb 26, 2025
@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot added Weekly KSv2 Awaiting Payment Auto-added when associated PR is deployed to production and removed Weekly KSv2 labels Mar 3, 2025
@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot changed the title [$50][Simplified Actions] [Internal] Update report action copies [Due for payment 2025-03-10] [$50][Simplified Actions] [Internal] Update report action copies Mar 3, 2025
@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot removed the Reviewing Has a PR in review label Mar 3, 2025
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Mar 3, 2025

Reviewing label has been removed, please complete the "BugZero Checklist".

Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Mar 3, 2025

The solution for this issue has been 🚀 deployed to production 🚀 in version 9.1.7-2 and is now subject to a 7-day regression period 📆. Here is the list of pull requests that resolve this issue:

If no regressions arise, payment will be issued on 2025-03-10. 🎊

For reference, here are some details about the assignees on this issue:

Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Mar 3, 2025

BugZero Checklist: The PR adding this new feature has been merged! The following checklist (instructions) will need to be completed before the issue can be closed:

  • [@ZhenjaHorbach] Please propose regression test steps to ensure the new feature will work correctly on production in further releases.
  • [@MitchExpensify] Link the GH issue for creating/updating the regression test once above steps have been agreed upon.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Awaiting Payment Auto-added when associated PR is deployed to production Internal Requires API changes or must be handled by Expensify staff NewFeature Something to build that is a new item. Weekly KSv2
Projects
Status: No status
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants