You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Feb 21, 2022. It is now read-only.
Information about supporting entities of dofs is thrown away in some subclasses of FiniteElement, e.g. DiscontinuousLagrange. The information is readily available - support entities of DiscontinuousLagrange are the same as Lagrange.entity_dofs() - but just thrown away.
The information is then needed to be recovered with hacks like FiniteElement.facet_support_dofs() and dolfin::DirichletBC::compute_bc_geometric.
Implement FiniteElement.support_entity_dofs().
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Original comment by Lawrence Mitchell (Bitbucket: wence, GitHub: wence).
I note that the Strang-Fix scheme (the canonical one) is a symmetric quadrature rule, whereas the four-point collapsed quadrature is non-symmetric. This may or may not be an issue.
Original report by Jan Blechta (Bitbucket: blechta, GitHub: blechta).
Information about supporting entities of dofs is thrown away in some subclasses of
FiniteElement
, e.g.DiscontinuousLagrange
. The information is readily available - support entities ofDiscontinuousLagrange
are the same asLagrange.entity_dofs()
- but just thrown away.The information is then needed to be recovered with hacks like
FiniteElement.facet_support_dofs()
anddolfin::DirichletBC::compute_bc_geometric
.Implement
FiniteElement.support_entity_dofs()
.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: