You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Having the FHIR definitions in specification.zip isn't necessary anymore since the introduction of FHIR packages (npm).
We should replace all functionality around specification.zip with either static npm packages or package resolvers.
More details about how to implement such a functionality and where it should live, is to be discussed below.
Tasklist:
Add package library to SDK
Implement NpmPackageResolver
Implement version specific CorePackageResolver
Use specific xml package for .xsd files.
Nullability
Move NpmPackageResolver to Support.Poco
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
And we would like people to be able to add their own/their SDO/their companies packages too. So, this should then be a matter of dropping npm files somewhere (this is what the tools produce). This seems to make using NuGet less favorable, otherwise everyone needs to wrap their NPMs in Nugets.
We should probably package the npm packages with the SDK, and add a feature to have additional npm packages installed on your machine's npm cache (which you can manage with any npm client - or torinox)
Having the FHIR definitions in specification.zip isn't necessary anymore since the introduction of FHIR packages (npm).
We should replace all functionality around specification.zip with either static npm packages or package resolvers.
More details about how to implement such a functionality and where it should live, is to be discussed below.
Tasklist:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: