Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Replace specification.zip with FHIR npm package(s) #1863

Closed
6 tasks done
mmsmits opened this issue Aug 23, 2021 · 3 comments
Closed
6 tasks done

Replace specification.zip with FHIR npm package(s) #1863

mmsmits opened this issue Aug 23, 2021 · 3 comments
Assignees

Comments

@mmsmits
Copy link
Member

mmsmits commented Aug 23, 2021

Having the FHIR definitions in specification.zip isn't necessary anymore since the introduction of FHIR packages (npm).
We should replace all functionality around specification.zip with either static npm packages or package resolvers.

More details about how to implement such a functionality and where it should live, is to be discussed below.

Tasklist:

  • Add package library to SDK
  • Implement NpmPackageResolver
  • Implement version specific CorePackageResolver
  • Use specific xml package for .xsd files.
  • Nullability
  • Move NpmPackageResolver to Support.Poco
@mmsmits mmsmits changed the title Replace specification.zip with NPM package(s) Replace specification.zip with FHIR npm package(s) Aug 23, 2021
@mmsmits
Copy link
Member Author

mmsmits commented Aug 26, 2021

Some options:

  • Resolve packages live. (Much more support when users have firewall issues, and have to be online)
  • Use a Nuget package to supply the fhir packages.
  • Embed packages in the solution (How is that different from specification.zip)

@ewoutkramer
Copy link
Member

And we would like people to be able to add their own/their SDO/their companies packages too. So, this should then be a matter of dropping npm files somewhere (this is what the tools produce). This seems to make using NuGet less favorable, otherwise everyone needs to wrap their NPMs in Nugets.

@ewoutkramer
Copy link
Member

We should probably package the npm packages with the SDK, and add a feature to have additional npm packages installed on your machine's npm cache (which you can manage with any npm client - or torinox)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants