Introduce Limiter abstraction for Executor parameters

[acerone85]

          Maybe we can take this opportunity and rename this to `transaction_count_limit`. 

I know it was merged like that in this PR, but this one will soon bring yet another similar name. Having such generic name as transactions_limit could be confusing.

Also, we might consider introducing a "limiter" abstraction in a follow-up ticket, instead of having three separate params.

Originally posted by @rafal-ch in #2189 (comment)

[xgreenx]

We still need separate parameters for WASM interface, so I think we don't need to change it=)