Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

data.gov feature list #4060

Closed
1 task done
jbrown-xentity opened this issue Nov 14, 2022 · 5 comments
Closed
1 task done

data.gov feature list #4060

jbrown-xentity opened this issue Nov 14, 2022 · 5 comments
Assignees

Comments

@jbrown-xentity
Copy link
Contributor

jbrown-xentity commented Nov 14, 2022

Purpose

We want to have a complete feature list of data.gov (categorized via MuSCoW: Must, Should, Could, Would), but we're not sure how to do that.

Given above has grown over the last decade, conducting research, code review, and documentation is needed to provide factual knowledge on future steps.

2 days of effort has been allocated and once compete, findings will be demonstrated and specific future actions will be decided.

Acceptance Criteria

[ACs should be clearly demo-able/verifiable whenever possible. Try specifying them using BDD.]

  • GIVEN an audit is complete
    WHEN 2 days of effort expires
    THEN a detailed spreadsheet is given
    AND a discussion is had on future data.gov tickets/epics

Background

Came out of discussion from harvesting discussion

Sketch

The spreadsheet should contain Feature, why (if available/applicable), complexity (t-shirt size), category (UI, harvesting, SEO, search, etc), sub-category

@jbrown-xentity jbrown-xentity self-assigned this Nov 14, 2022
@jbrown-xentity jbrown-xentity moved this to 🏗 In Progress [8] in data.gov team board Nov 14, 2022
@jbrown-xentity
Copy link
Contributor Author

@jbrown-xentity
Copy link
Contributor Author

I left some more comments, notes, and items around the Open Data Act on the Feature List. We should review this during a pairing session to answer questions and finalize on this for planning future epics.

@jbrown-xentity jbrown-xentity moved this from 🏗 In Progress [8] to 👀 Needs Review [2] in data.gov team board Nov 29, 2022
@jbrown-xentity jbrown-xentity moved this from 👀 Needs Review [2] to ✔ Done in data.gov team board Dec 8, 2022
@jbrown-xentity
Copy link
Contributor Author

After review with @nickumia-reisys and his work on #4089 , we have merged this where each feature is listed with it's corresponding law/memorandum requirements. See the Feature List on data.gov drive for latest information. This can be considered done, with review occurring with team during sprint review after discussions.

@nickumia-reisys
Copy link
Contributor

This is a beautiful ticket 🥲

@nickumia-reisys
Copy link
Contributor

Related to

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Archived in project
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants