-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 109
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
data.gov feature list #4060
Comments
I left some more comments, notes, and items around the Open Data Act on the Feature List. We should review this during a pairing session to answer questions and finalize on this for planning future epics. |
After review with @nickumia-reisys and his work on #4089 , we have merged this where each feature is listed with it's corresponding law/memorandum requirements. See the Feature List on data.gov drive for latest information. This can be considered done, with review occurring with team during sprint review after discussions. |
This is a beautiful ticket 🥲 |
Related to |
Purpose
We want to have a complete feature list of data.gov (categorized via MuSCoW: Must, Should, Could, Would), but we're not sure how to do that.
Given above has grown over the last decade, conducting research, code review, and documentation is needed to provide factual knowledge on future steps.
2 days of effort has been allocated and once compete, findings will be demonstrated and specific future actions will be decided.
Acceptance Criteria
[ACs should be clearly demo-able/verifiable whenever possible. Try specifying them using BDD.]
WHEN 2 days of effort expires
THEN a detailed spreadsheet is given
AND a discussion is had on future data.gov tickets/epics
Background
Came out of discussion from harvesting discussion
Sketch
The spreadsheet should contain Feature, why (if available/applicable), complexity (t-shirt size), category (UI, harvesting, SEO, search, etc), sub-category
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: