Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Brush size idea #158

Open
danwills opened this issue Sep 16, 2023 · 0 comments
Open

Brush size idea #158

danwills opened this issue Sep 16, 2023 · 0 comments

Comments

@danwills
Copy link
Contributor

I think it'd be really great to extend the idea of brush size in Ready slightly so that in addition to being a fraction of the simulation-size as small/medium/large etc, that the size can be specified in a dialog as a floating-point percent of the sim size.

I'm mainly thinking about this for working-with 2d RDs! (and particularly, square ones) Have it show a "What Percent Size?" dialog, such that you could enter a float like 0.1 to get a brush that is set to be as large as 10% of the simulation-res kinda-thing.. or 0.5 to get something that will paint a circular area with a diameter about a half-as-wide (and as long, if square) as the image.

This could apply to 3d-sims as well I suppose (seems like a much more interesting question for 3d sims! Could perhaps just base it on the max of the 3 dimension-sizes? seems maybe reasonable?

Sometimes at the moment the largest brush is no way near half the screen, but just now I did want something half-the-screen or bigger.. and there's no brush that can be made that large at present.

Maybe this should stay how-it-is for sims that run on-a-mesh and other non-raster-cases? I can see that it would be harder to get a good size metric there.. nothing-like impossible though! I'm not suggesting that we remove the existing options anyway.

But for raster-based sims? Seems to me like being able to enter 0.5 and get a brush that is half the size of the (square) sim, would be very nice (and who cares if it's slow-to-paint that large! Let's fix the slowness later!)

Happy to look into adding this myself (assuming Tim agrees it's a good plan!) but if Tim Isn't down for adding it, and until I get time-to, I just wanted to add it to the repo, so that if anyone wants to jump on it they can. Would love to hear any thoughts!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant