-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 9.5k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Snyk vulnerability range for unfixed vulnerabilities #14168
Comments
#9308 (more direct link to context) We wouldn't be able to confidently determine the correct "latest version" that snyk is considering ourselves in any post process step... (assumption: there is significant delay between the calculation of these constraints, the opening of PRs, and any post processing we might do as a result). Maybe if we are provided a timestamp for when a synk database was made we could use Any way "latest package version as of this snyk db snapshot" could be kept as extra data in a new field? |
For us to discuss: As far as not being able to use a live-snapshot of snyk, that is still a constraint we have (certainly in DevTools and PSI), but perhaps we could be more flexible in CLI? |
Looking at the latest snyk PR, it seems this has already taken effect? https://github.com/GoogleChrome/lighthouse/pull/14169/files#diff-2748424e6850e5ce49d2339a9d6e7d96a5f286e3c404618e0ef54e5c89d62055R7 |
We haven't made any change yet in this area. Our current post-processing logic only handles |
This is something we could do.
|
Summary
Hi 👋
My name is Amotz, working for Snyk.
I wanted to update you that we are revisiting our current method for providing ranges for unfixed vulnerabilities, as part of a standardization effort we are doing in this area.
See #8748 for context.
In cases of unfixed vulnerabilities, we'd like to provide
*
as the range, and, if necessary, have it resolved on LH side to a specific version range (e.g.<=x.y.z
), instead of resolving it on our side.We still don't have clear timeline for this, but wanted to give you heads up and start a discussion.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: