Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Control permissions of non-emptyDir volumes #11319

Closed
pmorie opened this issue Jul 15, 2015 · 7 comments
Closed

Control permissions of non-emptyDir volumes #11319

pmorie opened this issue Jul 15, 2015 · 7 comments
Labels
kind/design Categorizes issue or PR as related to design. lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed. sig/storage Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Storage.

Comments

@pmorie
Copy link
Member

pmorie commented Jul 15, 2015

Forking from #2630

This issue is to discuss how we can offer control of permissions on volumes that are not emptyDir or based on emptyDir (secrets, git repo, downward API) so that they can be used easily with packages that have requirements about perms.

@thockin @eparis @smarterclayton

@smarterclayton
Copy link
Contributor

So existing proposal is there is a pod wide security context that applies
to volumes (explicit or inferred). Volumes need to know the uid, gid,
SELinux label. They also may need perm flags, but I assume that is per
volume?

On Jul 15, 2015, at 2:12 PM, Paul Morie [email protected] wrote:

Forking from #2630
#2630

This issue is to discuss how we can offer control of permissions on volumes
that are not emptyDir or based on emptyDir (secrets, git repo, downward
API) so that they can be used easily with packages that have requirements
about perms.

@thockin https://github.com/thockin @eparis https://github.com/eparis
@smarterclayton https://github.com/smarterclayton


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#11319.

@pmorie
Copy link
Member Author

pmorie commented Jul 16, 2015

@smarterclayton I'm not sure whether I think it should be per-volume type -- it cuts across all volume types, doesn't it?

@smarterclayton
Copy link
Contributor

Maybe - I wasn't sure whether one of the types might not be amenable to having a perm forced.

@pmorie
Copy link
Member Author

pmorie commented Jul 29, 2015

@smarterclayton I am also not sure; I am talking to folks about this now.

@mbforbes mbforbes added kind/design Categorizes issue or PR as related to design. team/cluster labels Aug 17, 2015
@saad-ali saad-ali added the sig/storage Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Storage. label Sep 9, 2015
@thockin thockin added sig/storage Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Storage. and removed sig/storage Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Storage. area/volumes labels Aug 11, 2016
@fejta-bot
Copy link

Issues go stale after 30d of inactivity.
Mark the issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle stale.
Stale issues rot after an additional 30d of inactivity and eventually close.

Prevent issues from auto-closing with an /lifecycle frozen comment.

If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close.

Send feedback to sig-testing, kubernetes/test-infra and/or @fejta.
/lifecycle stale

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Dec 16, 2017
@fejta-bot
Copy link

Stale issues rot after 30d of inactivity.
Mark the issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle rotten.
Rotten issues close after an additional 30d of inactivity.

If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close.

Send feedback to sig-testing, kubernetes/test-infra and/or @fejta.
/lifecycle rotten
/remove-lifecycle stale

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed. and removed lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. labels Jan 15, 2018
@fejta-bot
Copy link

Rotten issues close after 30d of inactivity.
Reopen the issue with /reopen.
Mark the issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle rotten.

Send feedback to sig-testing, kubernetes/test-infra and/or fejta.
/close

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
kind/design Categorizes issue or PR as related to design. lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed. sig/storage Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Storage.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

7 participants