-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add new metrics that Gabe suggested #5
Comments
In commit 0373aa2, added code that computes amino-acid frequencies over all protein, in different secondary structures, and in different layers. Also computes di-peptide frequencies |
Counts of all possible rotamers Counts of all amino acid type pair interactions (serine residue or serine side chain within 4A of arg sidechain for example) rosetta score of 2, 3, 4, 5 residue sequences - what is good/bad? normalized to what? rosetta scores of small 3d neighborhoods TERM-based analysis counts of amino acids in certain secondary structures, or dipeptides in certain secondary structures more granular fragment analysis, such as the quality of specific regions of the chain |
In commit 6f8610b, added code for analyzing fragment quality at the level of individual sites (what is the average quality of all 9mer fragments centered upon a given site?) and within different kinds of secondary structures (what is the quality of all fragments that are centered upon a site within a given type of secondary structure?). Will add description of new metrics to README. @grocklin: Added a few new metrics described briefly above. It looks like fragment quality is computed using 9mers. Did you ever have code to analyze the fragment quality of 3mers? |
I never did analysis of 3mers.
…On Thu, Feb 14, 2019 at 12:33 PM Hugh Haddox ***@***.***> wrote:
In commit 6f8610b
<6f8610b>,
added code for analyzing fragment quality at the level of individual sites
(what is the average quality of all 9mer fragments centered upon a given
site?) and within different kinds of secondary structures (what is the
quality of all fragments that are centered upon a site within a given type
of secondary structure?). Will add description of new metrics to README.
@grocklin <https://github.com/grocklin>: Added a few new metrics
described briefly above. It looks like fragment quality is computed using
9mers. Did you ever have code to analyze the fragment quality of 3mers?
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#5 (comment)>,
or mute the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AErvp7UOpuSmzijjQUfPZBDPZ-Y-NNXYks5vNcgbgaJpZM4aWepW>
.
|
Add average length of helices / strands / loops? |
In commit 79f9b02, added code for analyzing per-residue Rosetta energies of fragments in primary sequence. |
In commit 72275b2, added code to compute energies of 3D neighborhoods around each residue |
In commit 8e2daa8, added code to compute the number of times each of the 20 amino acids contact each other in the structure |
Counts of all possible rotamers
Dipeptide counts in sequence
Counts of all amino acid type pair interactions (serine residue or serine side chain within 4A of arg sidechain for example)
rosetta score of 2, 3, 4, 5 residue sequences - what is good/bad? normalized to what?
rosetta scores of small 3d neighborhoods
TERM-based analysis
counts of amino acids in certain secondary structures, or dipeptides in certain secondary structures
more granular fragment analysis, such as the quality of specific regions of the chain
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: