Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Transport calling mechanism seems inverted #5

Open
kadler opened this issue Jun 14, 2016 · 2 comments
Open

Transport calling mechanism seems inverted #5

kadler opened this issue Jun 14, 2016 · 2 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Milestone

Comments

@kadler
Copy link
Member

kadler commented Jun 14, 2016

Original report by Kevin Adler (Bitbucket: kadler, GitHub: kadler).


How you call itoolkit transports seems backwards to me:

#!python

itransport = iLibCall()
itool = iToolKit()
itool.add(...)
itool.call(itransport)

would make more sense to me as:

#!python

itransport = iLibCall()
itool = iToolKit()
itool.add(...)
itransport.call(itool)
@kadler
Copy link
Member Author

kadler commented Aug 18, 2016

Original comment by Tony Cairns (Bitbucket: rangercairns, GitHub: rangercairns).


This is a low priority, but will be considered in future release.

@kadler
Copy link
Member Author

kadler commented Aug 18, 2016

Original comment by Tony Cairns (Bitbucket: rangercairns, GitHub: rangercairns).


status

@kadler kadler added major enhancement New feature or request and removed major labels Dec 21, 2018
@kadler kadler added this to the 1.8 milestone May 1, 2020
@kadler kadler modified the milestones: 1.8, 2.0 May 26, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant