Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Should we drop Qt 4.8 compatibility? #152

Closed
jounathaen opened this issue Jan 28, 2016 · 4 comments
Closed

Should we drop Qt 4.8 compatibility? #152

jounathaen opened this issue Jan 28, 2016 · 4 comments

Comments

@jounathaen
Copy link
Member

In the Github Project description it says, that QtPass requires Qt4.8 or higher. I noticed for example that the code consists of several of QStringLiteral which is - according to https://woboq.com/blog/qstringliteral.html - a QT5 Feature. So maybe the Qt4.8 compatibility should be removed from the project description

@annejan
Copy link
Member

annejan commented Jan 28, 2016

I have not checked recently but before the 1.0 release for all the Qt5 stuff there was a Qt4 fallback.

I'm giving this (building on Qt 4.8.6) a try and see if building fails I'll see what we can do, might go either way (updating site / README) or "fixing" the app ;-)

@annejan
Copy link
Member

annejan commented Jan 31, 2016

Turns out QtPass was compatible with Qt4.8 until just now . .
I had travis running a Qt 4.8.1 build since . . forever . . so I changed the title of this issue

But a very recent change I just literally now merged to master breaks qt4 compatibility.
https://travis-ci.org/IJHack/qtpass/jobs/105755073

Implemented a (neat) work-around . . again
https://travis-ci.org/IJHack/qtpass/jobs/106002053 back to Qt 4.8 compatibility . .
Since a clear button is not 'necessary' for the use of the app . .

@annejan annejan changed the title Qt 4.8 Should we drop Qt 4.8 compatibility? Jan 31, 2016
@annejan
Copy link
Member

annejan commented Feb 2, 2016

Might re-open when this comes up again ;)

Will keep (minimal) Qt4.8 compatibility since it is still used a lot in distro's . .

@annejan annejan closed this as completed Feb 2, 2016
@annejan
Copy link
Member

annejan commented Mar 2, 2017

I should probably setup CI for 4.8 if we want to keep it on . .

@annejan annejan reopened this Mar 2, 2017
@annejan annejan closed this as completed Jun 12, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants