Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Atom feed cannot be tested on staging instance #758

Closed
Kate-Lyndegaard opened this issue May 23, 2022 · 4 comments
Closed

Atom feed cannot be tested on staging instance #758

Kate-Lyndegaard opened this issue May 23, 2022 · 4 comments
Labels
deployed in reference validator Solution deployed in production non-breaking change The change makes tests less restrictive and it has no impact on resources already tested
Milestone

Comments

@Kate-Lyndegaard
Copy link

Hi,

I am currently trying to test our atom feeds, because there have been improvements introduced on staging. I was hoping to check for the changes implemented for #751. Unfortunately, when I attempt to test my atom feed, I get the following error at upload:
grafik
The test hangs and does not complete.

I can test the same atom feed in production, and there I receive the skipped Describe Spatial Dataset test as reported in #751.

Test atom feed used on staging and production: https://test.haleconnect.de/services/bsp/org.473.c3005a47-2e0c-4879-ab24-11920d7e40b5/service/atom/id_predefined_dataset

Atom feed test result in production:
AM_AtomFeed.zip

Kind regards,
Kate

@fabiovinci
Copy link
Collaborator

Dear @Kate-Lyndegaard,

thank you for opening the issue, we have noticed the error and we are already working to solve it.

@arantzaetxebarria
Copy link
Collaborator

Dear @Kate-Lyndegaard

We have implemented some changes related to the issue #819, these changes seem to fix this issue, could you please verify? Many thanks

Best regards

@arantzaetxebarria arantzaetxebarria added ready for testing Solution provided to reporter or developed & deployed in staging (or beta), waiting for testing and removed under analysis labels Jun 15, 2023
@Kate-Lyndegaard
Copy link
Author

Dear @arantzaetxebarria,

Thank you very much! I re-tested my service and it is working as expected. It's fully valid.

@arantzaetxebarria
Copy link
Collaborator

Dear @Kate-Lyndegaard

Thank you for your confirmation. I reopen the issue, once the next release (v2023.2) is made, it will be closed

Regards

@arantzaetxebarria arantzaetxebarria added solved Solution developed and accepted, not yet deployed and removed ready for testing Solution provided to reporter or developed & deployed in staging (or beta), waiting for testing labels Jun 15, 2023
@fabiovinci fabiovinci added the non-breaking change The change makes tests less restrictive and it has no impact on resources already tested label Jun 21, 2023
@jenriquesoriano jenriquesoriano added deployed in reference validator Solution deployed in production and removed solved Solution developed and accepted, not yet deployed labels Jun 22, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
deployed in reference validator Solution deployed in production non-breaking change The change makes tests less restrictive and it has no impact on resources already tested
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants