You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Nov 26, 2018. It is now read-only.
ISO19103 is almost ready now, and I suppose new ISO/TC211 models should be based on the new versions of data types. This is an issue we will have to consider for the revision of 19115-2.
19115-1 and the existing 19115-2 are using data types from 19103:2005. Should we use only data types from the old 19103 (2005) in the revision of 19115-2, or should we move to the new version?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
ISO19103 is almost ready now, and I suppose new ISO/TC211 models should be based on the new versions of data types. This is an issue we will have to consider for the revision of 19115-2.
19115-1 and the existing 19115-2 are using data types from 19103:2005. Should we use only data types from the old 19103 (2005) in the revision of 19115-2, or should we move to the new version?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: