Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Incorrect \cite labels #5202

Closed
albert-github opened this issue Feb 1, 2025 · 2 comments · Fixed by #5204
Closed

Incorrect \cite labels #5202

albert-github opened this issue Feb 1, 2025 · 2 comments · Fixed by #5204
Labels
type:Documentation Documentation improvement or change

Comments

@albert-github
Copy link
Contributor

Description

When running doxygen master version (1.14.0 (2a4d39eb79b8e049c69e1402c1b812fd9695567f)) on the ITK master version (f07f9ec) we get the warnings:

.../ITK/Modules/Filtering/ImageGrid/include/itkBSplineResampleImageFilterBase.h:47: warning: \cite command to 'unser199' does not have an associated number
.../ITK/Modules/Core/Common/include/itkGaussianDerivativeOperator.h:80: warning: \cite command to 'lindeberg1999' does not have an associated number
.../ITK/Modules/Filtering/Convolution/include/itkMaskedFFTNormalizedCorrelationImageFilter.h:128: warning: \cite command to 'padfield' does not have an associated number

Expected information

Correct links to the cited references

Actual information

warnings as indicated and no links

Versions

ITK Master (f07f9ec)

@albert-github albert-github added the type:Documentation Documentation improvement or change label Feb 1, 2025
@albert-github
Copy link
Contributor Author

Proposed patch: diff.patch

@albert-github albert-github changed the title Incorrect \cite lables Incorrect \cite labels Feb 1, 2025
@jhlegarreta
Copy link
Member

Thanks for reporting this @albert-github 👍.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
type:Documentation Documentation improvement or change
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants