You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I've noticed when I run a query via a search term, I will get A LOT of projects that don't have any stars. This causes the scripts to run at an unreasonable amount of time. In testing I've become accustomed to adding stars:>5 to the search terms query script in order to get relevant repos while at the same time making sure my script won't run forever.
Question: Does it make sense for us to make this a permanent change and add stars:>5 to to the search terms query?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Yes. That seems completely reasonable. In a majority of cases, I probably won't report a vulnerability I uncover if the project has under 100 unless the project is owned by an organization with a BB program.
I've noticed when I run a query via a search term, I will get A LOT of projects that don't have any stars. This causes the scripts to run at an unreasonable amount of time. In testing I've become accustomed to adding
stars:>5
to the search terms query script in order to get relevant repos while at the same time making sure my script won't run forever.Question: Does it make sense for us to make this a permanent change and add
stars:>5
to to the search terms query?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: