-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add compare button to duplicates in Citation relations tab #11192
Comments
@AbdAlRahmanGad Nice idea! Helps to see if JabRef works right - and also helps to add missing data to JabRef (if available) |
@koppor I wish to work on this issue with a teammate for university assignment. I had a query, I see that
|
Welcome to the vibrant world of open-source development with JabRef! Newcomers, we're excited to have you on board. Start by exploring our Contributing guidelines, and don't forget to check out our workspace setup guidelines to get started smoothly. Having any questions or issues? Feel free to ask here on GitHub. Need help setting up your local workspace? Join the conversation on JabRef's Gitter chat. And don't hesitate to open a (draft) pull request early on to show the direction it is heading towards. This way, you will receive valuable feedback. Happy coding! 🚀 |
The UI is direclty construced in CitationRelationsTab getPaneAndStartSearch |
Hi @HoussemNasri @Siedlerchr @koppor, is this issue still available to take? Could you please assign this issue to me? |
I think it would be nice if we added a compare button to the duplicates in the citation relations tab.
The compare button will open the "Possible duplicate entries" window.
It will look something like this:
![Screenshot 2024-04-14 at 10 51 47 AM](https://private-user-images.githubusercontent.com/89566409/322259279-063ef61e-8302-48ec-9e6d-1b013880452e.png?jwt=eyJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiIsInR5cCI6IkpXVCJ9.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.0eszuzcvGnXBwesty36VJBqjudfnI4B1ceANQJ5KNfA)
For more context:
The duplication detection in the citation relations tab was implemented in this PR #11186
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: