-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
v5.2 High RAM utilisation followed with high CPU use when field formaters and autosave are enabled #7567
Comments
Do you observe the same with the current development version? |
testing... give me a couple of days pls |
Well, just started the developmental version JabRef 5.3--2021-03-26--badffe9 and what is immediately noticeable is that it is much more memory hungry, see below: Starting the stable v5.2 stable version it started around ~300MB of RAM, the developmental version starts outright at ~1.2GB. I will keep testing further on... |
I can confirm now that after approx. 24h of running JabRef 5.3--2021-03-26-badffe9 the RAM use is very high: As you can see, as a result of this there is a considerable higher CPU use as well. Please note I am not running any tasks on JabRef, I basically just opened the app and kept it open for 24 hours with three |
I think I was able to identify the culprit. On one of the What is happening, as far as I can identify, is that as soon as Field Formatters are turned on a |
Thanks, we are currently in the progress of fixing issues with the save and autosave options, will keep an eye on it |
meta-issue: #8906 |
To do:
|
JabRef 5.2--2020-12-24--6a2a512
Windows 10 10.0 amd64
Java 14.0.2
I accidentally left open JabRef with 2 files open over the weekend. When I got back to the computer on Monday I noticed that JabRef uses 8GB out of 32GB RAM, and every 2-3 minutes the CPU bursts into 100% use making even the basic music listening to stutter. For the record, the CPU is an i7-7700HQ, so not that weak. I think this is something the devs should look into, especially the RAM use, as I believe the CPU use is just the consequence of it. I believe it should not happen with a stable version of the app.
Steps to reproduce the behavior:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: