From d8ccb260e850e421a66f3046428af6b0cf264487 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: neel-maniar <91568147+neel-maniar@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2024 23:09:08 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] Update intro_to_gps.py

A small typo: $\mathbf{X}\in \mathbf{X}$ was update to $\mathbf{X}\in\mathcal{X}$

Signed-off-by: neel-maniar <91568147+neel-maniar@users.noreply.github.com>
---
 docs/examples/intro_to_gps.py | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/docs/examples/intro_to_gps.py b/docs/examples/intro_to_gps.py
index 114c51791..fcdbc73bd 100644
--- a/docs/examples/intro_to_gps.py
+++ b/docs/examples/intro_to_gps.py
@@ -403,7 +403,7 @@
 # $\mathbf{K}_{ff}$ such that the $(i, j)^{\text{th}}$ entry of the matrix is
 # given by $[\mathbf{K}_{ff}]_{i, j} = k(\mathbf{x}_i, \mathbf{x}_j)$. As is
 # conventional within the literature, we centre our training data and assume
-# $\mu(\mathbf{X}):= 0$ for all $\mathbf{X}\in\mathbf{X}$. We further drop
+# $\mu(\mathbf{X}):= 0$ for all $\mathbf{X}\in\mathcal{X}$. We further drop
 # dependency on $\boldsymbol{\theta}$ and $\mathbf{X}$ for notational
 # convenience in the remainder of this article.
 #