You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
There's not really a reason to derive from for () for variants without fields. It's somewhat unexpected and results in the problems described here in #105. Let's remove this in the next breaking release, probably 1.0.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Could you also please make a warning if a crate has some spurious #[from(ignores)] that it would no longer need with version 1.0. I currently am having many of those #[from(ignore]) annotations in my crates and it would be a blessing to have some indicators by the macro itself if they are no longer useful.
There's not really a reason to derive from for
()
for variants without fields. It's somewhat unexpected and results in the problems described here in #105. Let's remove this in the next breaking release, probably 1.0.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: