You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In the interest of simplifying the relevance of locks being able to pay for various costs associated with transactions, which ideally should not be the invite lock, we need to remove the ability of having funds subject to vesting constraint be able to fund extrinsic inclusion fees. Currently this is the functionality of the vesting pallet we use, which comes with the FRAME suite.
We have two alternatives
forking vesting pallet and making lock configurable: we likely could get this merged back into upstream even, but lets not depend on that!
In the interest of simplifying the relevance of locks being able to pay for various costs associated with transactions, which ideally should not be the invite lock, we need to remove the ability of having funds subject to vesting constraint be able to fund extrinsic inclusion fees. Currently this is the functionality of the
vesting
pallet we use, which comes with the FRAME suite.We have two alternatives
┆Issue is synchronized with this Asana task by Unito
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: