-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 32
Images? #50
Comments
Looks like I'm truncating too much of the error message, let me pull the full one |
|
Why does it work on 0.2 but not 0.3?? |
Ah, that error message makes much more sense. The error itself is still weird. I'm going to run this through valgrind. |
On my machine, nothing really came up with valgrind. But then again, the code almost always works on mine machine. Does that test fail reliably on your machine? This looks like JuliaLang/julia#5153. |
(If it is a reliable failure, it would be worth trying git bisect to see if one can isolate the commit.) |
I'm trying on my own machine (5 day old master), I get
with Images v0.2.34 but here is the strangest thing - apparently PkgEvaluator tested 0.2.32...?! |
I tagged new versions today, so if PkgEvaluator ran last night it was surely the older version. That error is weird; I doubt there is anything that should have changed in the last 24 hours to make that fail. Is this error reliable? (The test does depend on random numbers.) If so, what are the values of |
Ah ok, that explains that. It happens consistently, I added some printlns
|
I've tested this on two machines (one Kubuntu 12.04 and one CentOS 6.4) and I can't reproduce this. What platform are you on? What version of ImageMagic is installed? What happens if you do this at the REPL?
|
Now it's mysteriously passing, every day, on 0.3. |
At least now we can look back over time and see when things break a bit easier! |
Hate to do this to you, but is there any way I can get you to try running the tests for Images on 0.3? On my machine they pass, but here they fail with a Zlib error (CC @dcjones):
(I love being able to see the reason for the failure!)
I believe I've seen that error once on my machine, out of thousands of runs, but I have the impression that Images repeatedly fails on yours.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: