You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on May 5, 2019. It is now read-only.
I don't think it's very clear now. Ideally most packages would just depend on AbstractTables and work with both DataFrames and DataTables, but we need to create that interface first. The port of StatsModels is going to be a good test for that.
Sounds good, is there somewhere to keep up-to-date with this? It would be supercool to have one place for package owners to stay updated about the transition and preferred approach.
OK I follow the discourse thread and JuliaData/DataFrames.jl#1092 but hadn't heard about AbstractTables. That sounds great, but also makes me change some updates I had already done, hence my request for a location to follow. Right, thanks for the pointers.
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
When is the recommended date to make DataTables branches of packages that depend on DataFrames the main branch (i.e. the one that goes into METADATA)?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: