Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on May 5, 2019. It is now read-only.

Recommended date to make DataTables branches master #25

Open
mkborregaard opened this issue Feb 27, 2017 · 4 comments
Open

Recommended date to make DataTables branches master #25

mkborregaard opened this issue Feb 27, 2017 · 4 comments

Comments

@mkborregaard
Copy link
Contributor

When is the recommended date to make DataTables branches of packages that depend on DataFrames the main branch (i.e. the one that goes into METADATA)?

@nalimilan
Copy link
Member

I don't think it's very clear now. Ideally most packages would just depend on AbstractTables and work with both DataFrames and DataTables, but we need to create that interface first. The port of StatsModels is going to be a good test for that.

@mkborregaard
Copy link
Contributor Author

Sounds good, is there somewhere to keep up-to-date with this? It would be supercool to have one place for package owners to stay updated about the transition and preferred approach.

@nalimilan
Copy link
Member

I guess once we have a plan we will post it to the Discourse thread. JuliaData/DataFrames.jl#1092 should also reflect the progress.

If you want to follow the ongoing work, have a look at issues and PRs in StatsModels.

@mkborregaard
Copy link
Contributor Author

OK I follow the discourse thread and JuliaData/DataFrames.jl#1092 but hadn't heard about AbstractTables. That sounds great, but also makes me change some updates I had already done, hence my request for a location to follow. Right, thanks for the pointers.

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants