You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The Markdown page should have been the first entry in the results list.
I wonder if the ranking is intentional, e.g. because the page has considerably less content than the section placed first. If that's the case, then I'd suggest indicating that factor in the search results (e.g. as a word count, or some abstracted "percentage match" number).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Initially reported as part of #629. In the example there, a search for "markdown" (http://docs.julialang.org/en/latest/search/?q=markdown) produced the first few results:
The Markdown page should have been the first entry in the results list.
I wonder if the ranking is intentional, e.g. because the page has considerably less content than the section placed first. If that's the case, then I'd suggest indicating that factor in the search results (e.g. as a word count, or some abstracted "percentage match" number).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: