Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Coverage analysis is wrong even with --inline=no #40461

Open
ronisbr opened this issue Apr 13, 2021 · 0 comments
Open

Coverage analysis is wrong even with --inline=no #40461

ronisbr opened this issue Apr 13, 2021 · 0 comments
Labels
code coverage

Comments

@ronisbr
Copy link
Member

ronisbr commented Apr 13, 2021

Hi!

Sometime ago I opened a bug due to some errors in coverage:

JuliaCI/Coverage.jl#187

By that time, the problems were greatly reduced if we add the option --inline=no to Julia during the analysis. However, Pkg.jl did not support this, which was added here:

JuliaLang/Pkg.jl#870

Today, using Julia 1.6, I can no longer see coverage improvements in my tests when I pass --inline=no. Is it a know bug? Is there anything I can do to improve these results? Check for example this report:

image
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
code coverage
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@ronisbr @nsajko