-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
High CPU utilization with 20+ tracks #1916
Comments
Fixed. :) Seriously though, depending on the back-end, I can agree that we have very high CPU utilization on your spoken track regardless of the backend being used and speaks more to need for overall resource improvements rather than a specific plugin. I can get the software to run really slow and take up all of my CPU just adding TripleOscillators and piano rolls, so from my findings, the Zyn stuff you are observing is likely to be core-performance related. |
Oh... and here're some test results from an unlikely thread title: #1600 (comment) |
Lol, my track has become a benchmark :D How awesome! @tresf My first idea is: could LMMS dynamically "stop" any instrument/effects plugins from operation if they have no notes played or sounds above (ror example) -80dB level coming out? |
No idea what can be done to help this. It will take some research. 👍 |
@unfa |
I know Zyn is big and having 25 instances makes an impact, but hey - there are only 4-5 of them playing simultaneously at all times - why do the rest drains my CPU time when they are not used?
It feels like every new instance of ZynAddSubFX adds some CPU drain even when it's not playing any notes. I wonder if it's really ZynAddSubFX responsible the performance impact or is it LMMS.
I wonder if something could be done about this.
The project I've expirienced this issue in is here:
https://lmms.io/lsp/?action=show&file=6599
Let me know if you experience this performance impact too.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: