Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Why is there no split/val.txt? #6

Open
city945 opened this issue May 2, 2024 · 3 comments
Open

Why is there no split/val.txt? #6

city945 opened this issue May 2, 2024 · 3 comments

Comments

@city945
Copy link

city945 commented May 2, 2024

I found this expression in the paper, "In our experiments, all the detectors are trained independently on the training split (2,000 frames of them are used as validation set during the training) of each point cloud group and evaluated on the testing split of all the groups, respectively."
However, there are only train.txt and test.txt in the split directory. I want to know if the last 2000 frames of data in train.txt are used as validation set.

@fangjin-cool
Copy link

Apologies for the delayed response. The original GitHub account could not be retrieved due to issues with two-factor authentication. In actual experiments, I randomly selected 2,000 frames from the training set as the validation set. I have performed this random selection multiple times, and the results were consistent. I recommend using random sampling.

@city945
Copy link
Author

city945 commented May 30, 2024

Apologies for the delayed response. The original GitHub account could not be retrieved due to issues with two-factor authentication. In actual experiments, I randomly selected 2,000 frames from the training set as the validation set. I have performed this random selection multiple times, and the results were consistent. I recommend using random sampling.

"Thank you for your answer, I understand now. Additionally, do you have any plans to create a sequence-based dataset similar to NuScenes? Sometimes, sequence data can be very useful."

@fangjin-cool
Copy link

Apologies for the delayed response. The original GitHub account could not be retrieved due to issues with two-factor authentication. In actual experiments, I randomly selected 2,000 frames from the training set as the validation set. I have performed this random selection multiple times, and the results were consistent. I recommend using random sampling.

"Thank you for your answer, I understand now. Additionally, do you have any plans to create a sequence-based dataset similar to NuScenes? Sometimes, sequence data can be very useful."

Thank you for your suggestion, the sequential dataset is indeed very useful. Our method supports the generation of sequential data, but in LiDAR-CS, we will not release the sequential dataset for the time being, mainly because multi-sensor data with sequence information poses potential risks in terms of related data regulations.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants