Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

test loading legacy checkpoints #4900

Closed
Borda opened this issue Nov 29, 2020 · 2 comments · Fixed by #5223
Closed

test loading legacy checkpoints #4900

Borda opened this issue Nov 29, 2020 · 2 comments · Fixed by #5223
Assignees
Labels
checkpointing Related to checkpointing ci Continuous Integration feature Is an improvement or enhancement help wanted Open to be worked on priority: 1 Medium priority task
Milestone

Comments

@Borda
Copy link
Member

Borda commented Nov 29, 2020

🚀 Feature

create persistent storage with all legacy version checkpoints and try to load and continue training

@Borda Borda added feature Is an improvement or enhancement help wanted Open to be worked on ci Continuous Integration checkpointing Related to checkpointing priority: 1 Medium priority task labels Nov 29, 2020
@Borda Borda added this to the 1.1 milestone Nov 29, 2020
@edenlightning edenlightning modified the milestones: 1.1, 1.1.x Dec 4, 2020
@awaelchli
Copy link
Contributor

awaelchli commented Dec 16, 2020

@tchaton asked me to work on this, so I will assign myself and create a workflow.

@awaelchli awaelchli self-assigned this Dec 16, 2020
@Borda
Copy link
Member Author

Borda commented Dec 16, 2020

you will need to create an S3. bucket and get access there for saving checkpoiints

@awaelchli awaelchli removed their assignment Dec 17, 2020
@Borda Borda mentioned this issue Dec 21, 2020
11 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
checkpointing Related to checkpointing ci Continuous Integration feature Is an improvement or enhancement help wanted Open to be worked on priority: 1 Medium priority task
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

4 participants