You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In my opinion, the MIC of the ACK message is not correctly calculated. According to TS011-1.0.0 section 6.2, the CMAC is calculated over block B_0, AckUplinkEnc and WOR, where "WOR contains the data received in the WOR Relay Class A Uplink".
I read this as follows: the Frequency and Datarate fields in the WOR block should be the Frequency and Datarate as received in the WOR frame.
However, in LBM, the MIC is calculated using the Frequency and Datarate of the ACK message:
Hi team,
In my opinion, the MIC of the ACK message is not correctly calculated. According to TS011-1.0.0 section 6.2, the CMAC is calculated over block B_0, AckUplinkEnc and WOR, where "WOR contains the data received in the WOR Relay Class A Uplink".
I read this as follows: the Frequency and Datarate fields in the WOR block should be the Frequency and Datarate as received in the WOR frame.
However, in LBM, the MIC is calculated using the Frequency and Datarate of the ACK message:
SWL2001/lbm_lib/smtc_modem_core/lr1mac/src/relay/relay_tx/relay_tx.c
Lines 596 to 609 in 0ad056a
SWL2001/lbm_lib/smtc_modem_core/lr1mac/src/relay/common/wake_on_radio.c
Lines 284 to 287 in 0ad056a
I think that these fields should refer to the WOR payload's Freq/Dr instead. Please let me know your thoughts!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: