You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This is definetely not an "Issue" although marked as.
Really love your commitment to share your works code. To allow interested persons to share thoughts on the algorithm, applications & help each other, I recomment to open an "Organization" for this project, see https://help.github.com/en/articles/about-team-discussions
Best regards
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Thanks for the suggestion. I think the number of issues (and probably users) is quite low, so probably not necessary. I will keep this "issue" open in case people want to use it for that purpose at some point, and I also keep open those that can answer questions new users may have.
To start it, here is my thought:
For investigation purposes, I would like to turn of everything depth related and just visualize the plain optical flow result. Setting lamda_d and my _0 to zero somehow doesn't end in results I would have expected.
Any help!?
By doing that you are removing one constraint per pixel but you still solve for the same number of unknowns (optical flow + depth change), so I don't think it's a good idea.
If you just need optical flow you would need to change the code significantly.
This is definetely not an "Issue" although marked as.
Really love your commitment to share your works code. To allow interested persons to share thoughts on the algorithm, applications & help each other, I recomment to open an "Organization" for this project, see
https://help.github.com/en/articles/about-team-discussions
Best regards
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: