Materials classes: periodic table elements groups #448
Labels
misc/question
Further information is requested
PR/requires-discussion
status/has-concrete-suggestion
This issue has one or more concrete suggestions spelled out that can be brought up for consensus.
topic/filtering-language
Issue discussing changes and improvements to the query and filtering language
type/proposal
Proposal for addition/removal of features. May need broad discussion to reach consensus.
Dear colleagues,
we're now releasing the periodic table user interface component, and one of its features is the whole column or row selection, such as
chalcogens
,actinides
,period 6
,group 11
, etc. While we are about to fully support such groups on MPDS (e.g.{"classes": "tetrels, actinide"}
in our API/v0
or_mpds_classes HAS ALL "tetrels", "actinide"
in our API/v1
) as well as in the other projects, I'm thinking if it makes sense to promote the names of these groups further to the standard.Of course, their support should be absolutely voluntary, but I personally think it's way much easier to query just
alkaline
instead ofBe | Mg | Ca | Sr | Ba | Ra
orperiod 2
instead ofLi | Be | B | C | N | O | F | Ne
. On top of that, it also stimulates reach and interesting queries exploring periodicity and chemical elements similarity. Note, this is relevant not only for the unary compounds, but for the compounds of any arity (binary, ternary), including those groups of elements.Here is the whole list of the element groups, as we are now supporting (or about to support) them.
What would be your opinion on that? Beware, there are some caveats on the singular-plural forms or case-sensitivity.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: