Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Potentially mark 'Partial data' functionality as alpha/experimental #479

Closed
ml-evs opened this issue Jun 22, 2023 · 4 comments
Closed

Potentially mark 'Partial data' functionality as alpha/experimental #479

ml-evs opened this issue Jun 22, 2023 · 4 comments
Labels
misc/question Further information is requested

Comments

@ml-evs
Copy link
Member

ml-evs commented Jun 22, 2023

In today's meeting we discussed "demoting" partial data to an experimental feature, to guard against the fact that no-one will be able to implement it before v1.2 is released.

The idea would be to add a note that gives us the freedom to make breaking changes to "partial data" in a future v1.x release.

@ml-evs ml-evs added the misc/question Further information is requested label Jun 22, 2023
@ml-evs
Copy link
Member Author

ml-evs commented Jun 22, 2023

Alternatively create 1.2-rc2 as a "everyone implement this" release candidate

@JPBergsma
Copy link
Contributor

Isn't our development branch already a kind of experimental branch ? So that you know which features/changes are coming up.
So I think I prefer releasing a 1.3 soon after over having finished implementing the trajectory stuff, over putting it as an experimental feature in 1.2.

@ml-evs
Copy link
Member Author

ml-evs commented Jun 26, 2023

Isn't our development branch already a kind of experimental branch ? So that you know which features/changes are coming up.
So I think I prefer releasing a 1.3 soon after over having finished implementing the trajectory stuff, over putting it as an experimental feature in 1.2.

Indeed, but this is exactly why partial data (already merged) should be marked as experimental so that we can still include any necessary changes arising from trajectories without holding up the 1.2 release.

@JPBergsma
Copy link
Contributor

Couldn't we just leave out these changes from the next release branch ?

@ml-evs ml-evs closed this as not planned Won't fix, can't repro, duplicate, stale Mar 22, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
misc/question Further information is requested
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants